Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320325›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2022

Epigenetic regulation of

Katerina-Marina Pilala, Maria-Alexandra Papadimitriou, Konstantina Panoutsopoulou, Petros Barbarigos, Panagiotis Levis, Georgios Kotronopoulos, Konstantinos Stravodimos, Andreas Scorilas, Margaritis Avgeris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Exploring the methyl-verse: Dynamic interplay of epigenome and m6A epitranscriptome.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Consequences of genetic variants in miRNA genes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katerina-Marina PilalaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Maria-Alexandra PapadimitriouDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Konstantina PanoutsopoulouDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Petros BarbarigosDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Panagiotis LevisFirst Department of Urology, "Laiko" General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Georgios KotronopoulosFirst Department of Urology, "Laiko" General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos StravodimosFirst Department of Urology, "Laiko" General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Andreas ScorilasDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Margaritis AvgerisDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to its highly heterogeneous molecular landscape, bladder cancer (BlCa) is still characterized by non-personalized treatment and lifelong surveillance. Motivated by our previous findings on miR-143/145 value in disease prognosis, we have studied the underlying epigenetic regulation of the miR-143/145 cluster in BlCa. Expression and DNA methylation of miR-143/145 cluster were analyzed in our screening (n = 162) and The Cancer Genome Atlas Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma (TCGA-BLCA; n = 412) cohorts. Survival analysis was performed using tumor relapse and progression as clinical endpoints for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC; TaT1), while disease progression and patients' death were used for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC; T2-T4). TCGA-BLCA served as validation cohort. Bootstrap analysis was carried out for internal validation, while decision curve analysis was used to evaluate clinical benefit. TCGA-BLCA and screening cohorts highlighted

Indexed as

bladder tumorsDNA methylationepigeneticsmiRNAMT: Non-coding RNAsprognosispyrosequencingtumor progressionurothelial bladder carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36320325
PMCPMC9614648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.