Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320282›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2022

A resistive sensor for humidity detection based on cellulose/polyaniline.

Ilaria Ragazzini, Riccardo Castagnoli, Isacco Gualandi, Maria Cristina Cassani, Daniele Nanni, Francesca Gambassi, Erika Scavetta, Elena Bernardi, Barbara Ballarin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Humidity Sensors Based on ZnO-BiFeOSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilaria RagazziniDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.
Riccardo CastagnoliDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.
Isacco GualandiDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-7501
Maria Cristina CassaniDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-8744
Daniele NanniDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1472-1194
Francesca GambassiDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.
Erika ScavettaDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.
Elena BernardiDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.
Barbara BallarinDepartment of Industrial Chemistry "Toso Montanari", Bologna University, UdR INSTM Bologna Via Risorgimento 4 I-40136 Bologna Italy barbara.ballarin@unibo.it isacco.gualandi2@unibo.it +390512093704 +390512093386.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-2352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ambient humidity is an important parameter that affects the manufacturing and storage of several industrial and agricultural goods. In the view of the Internet of Things (IoT), single sensors could be associated with an object for smart monitoring enabling optimum conditions to be maintained. Nevertheless, the production of cost-effective humidity sensors for indoor and outdoor environmental monitoring currently represents the main bottleneck in the development of this technology. Herein we report the results obtained with sensors exclusively made of cellulose and polyaniline (cell/PANI) under strictly controlled relative humidity (30-50 RH%) and temperature (21 ± 1 °C) achieved with a climatic chamber that simulates the conditions of indoor air humidity, and at different RH% in a lab test chamber set-up. Cell/PANI sensors, prepared with a simple, inexpensive, and easily scalable industrial paper process, show a linear trend with a slope of 1.41 μA RH%

Identifiers

PMID36320282
PMCPMC9530799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.