Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320223›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2022

An Algorithm Approach to Phantom Limb Pain.

Jacob Boomgaardt, Kovosh Dastan, Tiffany Chan, Ashley Shilling, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Lynn Kohan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Phantom Limb Pain Assessment Tools: A Literature Review Exploring Strengths and Limitations.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Phantom Limb Pain Management.The Journal of hand surgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Phantom limb syndrome: from pathogenesis to treatment. A narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacob BoomgaardtDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Kovosh DastanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Tiffany ChanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ashley ShillingDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Lynn KohanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a common condition that occurs following both upper and lower limb amputation. First recognized and described in 1551 by Ambroise Pare, research into its underlying pathology and effective treatments remains a very active and growing field. To date, however, there is little consensus regarding the optimal management of phantom limb pain. With few large well-designed clinical trials of which to make treatment recommendations, as well as significant heterogeneity in clinical response to available treatments, the management of PLP remains challenging. Below we summarize the current state of knowledge in the field, as well as propose an algorithm for the approach to the treatment of PLP.

Indexed as

phantom painphantom sensationsresidual limb painstump pain

Identifiers

PMID36320223
PMCPMC9618240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.