Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36320040›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2022

GATA3 expression in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the lower urinary tract: a potential diagnostic pitfall.

Mahmut Akgul, Robert Humble, Abdullah Osme, Servet Yuce, Elif N Kocak, Parisa Najafzadeh, Ankur Sangoi, Niharika Pattnaik, Sourav Mishra, Shivani Sharma and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comprehensive Molecular, Pathological, and Clinical Characterization of Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Urinary Tract.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Mahmut AkgulDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Robert HumbleDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Abdullah OsmeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Servet YuceDepartment of Public Health, Istanbul University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Elif N KocakDepartment of Public Health, Istanbul University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Parisa NajafzadehDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ankur SangoiDepartment of Pathology, El Camino Hospital, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Niharika PattnaikSRL Diagnostics, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India.
Sourav MishraApollo Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India.
Shivani SharmaDCP, Core Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Nada ShakerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Seema KaushalAIIMS, Delhi, India.
Manas BaisakhApollo Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India.
Andrea R LightleDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Bonnie L BalzerDepartment of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Guang-Qian XiaoDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gregory T MacLennanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Adeboye O OsunkoyaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anil ParwaniDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Liang ChengDepartment of Pathology and Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Andrew BellizziDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sambit K MohantyDCP, Core Diagnostics, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. sambit04@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClear cell adenocarcinoma of the lower urinary tract (CCACLUT) is a rare primary malignant neoplasm with heterogenous morphology. There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding its immunohistochemical profile.

methodsThe immunohistochemical features (extent and intensity) of a multinational cohort of CCACLUT were evaluated with comparison between clear cell adenocarcinoma of the female genital tract (CCACFGT, tissue microarray) and nephrogenic adenoma (NA).

results33 CCACLUT (24 female, 9 male; mean age 59 years) were collected. CCACLUT most commonly arose from the urinary bladder (26/33, 78%), particularly from the trigone (10/33, 30.3%) followed by the urethra (8/33, 22%). All 12 NA cases were located at the urinary bladder, whereas the most common CCACFGT location was the ovary (29/56, 52%). None of the CCACLUT patients had, intestinal metaplasia, NA, or urothelial carcinoma. One patient had concurrent endometriosis of the sigmoid colon. Most frequently observed morphology in CCACLUT was papillary/tubulocystic (9/3; 27.3%), followed by papillary/tubular (6/33; 18.2%) and papillary/solid (5/33; 15.2%). GATA3 expression was significantly higher in CCACLUT (18/33, 54.5%) and NA (6/12, 50%), when compared to CCACFGT cases 6/56, 11.7%)(p = 0.001 and p = 0.022, respectively). The extent of GATA3 was significantly higher in CCACLUT group (19.2 ± 16.6%) than the other groups (9.6 ± 22.5% in NA and 2.6 ± 9% in CCACFGT group) (p = 0.001). 4/33 patients (12.1) had weak, 10/33 patients (30.3%) had moderate, and 4/33 patients (12.1%) had strong GATA3 intensity in CCACLUT group. In NA group, one patient (8.3%, 1/12) had weak, one patient (8.3%, 1/12) had moderate and 4 patients (33.3%, 4/12) had strong GATA3 intensity. Most cases (CCACLUT 29/33, 88%; NA 11/12, 92%; CCACFGT 46/56, 82.1%) had positive Napsin A expression, by which CCACLUT had significantly more cases with Napsin A expression (p = 0.034). p63 was consistently negative in all cases (30/33 (91.9%) CCACLUT; 12/12 (100%) NA; 42/56 (75%) CCACFGT. Ki67 (MIB) proliferation index was significantly higher in CCACLUT group (54.6 ± 21%) when compared to NA group (4.5 ± 2.7%) and CCACFGT group (35.5 ± 25.8%) (p = 0.001).

conclusionCCACLUT has consistent GATA3 expression, which may cause challenge in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma but can be used to distinguish CCACLUT from CCACFGT.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGATA3 Transcription FactorHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedUrinary BladderBiomarkers, TumorGATA3 protein, humanGATA3 Transcription FactorClear cell adenocarcinomaGATA3ImmunohistochemistryLower urinary tract

Identifiers

PMID36320040
PMCPMC9623977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.