Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36319977›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2022

Bronchial artery embolization for the management of frequent hemoptysis caused by bronchiectasis.

Guang-Dong Lu, Hai-Tao Yan, Jin-Xing Zhang, Sheng Liu, Hai-Bin Shi, Qing-Quan Zu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeted bronchial artery embolization: a life-saving intervention for recurrent massive hemoptysis in bronchiectasis.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guang-Dong Lu *Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Hai-Tao Yan *Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Jin-Xing ZhangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Sheng LiuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Hai-Bin ShiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Qing-Quan ZuDepartment of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China. zuqingquan@njmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of bronchial artery embolization (BAE) compared with conservative therapy for the treatment of frequent hemoptysis caused by bronchiectasis.

methodsFrom January 2015 to December 2019, consecutive patients who were admitted due to frequent (more than three times per year) bronchiectasis-related hemoptysis were retrospectively reviewed. Those who were treated with either BAE (n = 69) or conservative therapy (n = 47) were enrolled for analysis. The technical success, clinical success, and complications of the BAE procedure were evaluated. Long-term hemoptysis-free survival rates and clinical success were compared between patients in the BAE group and patients in the conservative group. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify the predictors of recurrent hemoptysis.

resultsThe technical success rate was 100% for the BAE procedure, and clinical success was achieved in 92.8% (64 of 69) of cases. No major procedure-related complications occurred, and minor complications were observed in 16 cases (23.2%). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year hemoptysis-free survival rates were 88.3, 71.3, and 66.2%, respectively, for the BAE group and 31.9, 17.6, and 2.5%, respectively, for the conservative treatment group (P <  0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that BAE was a protective factor against recurrent hemoptysis in treated patients. In addition, the presence of cystic bronchiectasis was the only independent risk factor for rebleeding in the whole population and in the BAE group.

conclusionsBAE may provide an effective option for patients with frequent bronchiectasis-related hemoptysis, especially for those without cystic bronchiectasis.

Indexed as

BronchiectasisEmbolization, TherapeuticBronchial ArteriesHemoptysisHumansRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBronchial arteriesBronchiectasisEmbolizationHemoptysisTherapeutic

Identifiers

PMID36319977
PMCPMC9624090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.