Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36319867›Full record

SynthesisOecologia2022

Predator-induced transgenerational plasticity in animals: a meta-analysis.

Kirsty J MacLeod, Chloé Monestier, Maud C O Ferrari, Katie E McGhee, Michael J Sheriff, Alison M Bell

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oecologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Short-term heat waves have long-term consequences for parents and offspring in stickleback.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirsty J MacLeod *Department of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden. k.macleod@bangor.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-3809
Chloé Monestier *Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behavior, Carle R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biolog, University of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. monestier.chloe@gmail.com.
Maud C O FerrariDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, WCVM, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, S7N 5B4, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Katie E McGheeDepartment of Biology, The University of the South, Sewanee, TN, 37375, USA.
Michael J SheriffBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, 02747, USA.
Alison M BellDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behavior, Carle R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biolog, University of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. alisonmb@illinois.edu.

Funding

MIRA: The biological basis of paternal care in stickleback fishR35GM139597 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELL, ALISON MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence that the environment experienced by one generation can influence phenotypes in the next generation via transgenerational plasticity (TGP). One of the best-studied examples of TGP in animals is predator-induced transgenerational plasticity, whereby exposing parents to predation risk triggers changes in offspring phenotypes. Yet, there is a lack of general consensus synthesizing the predator-prey literature with existing theory pertaining to ecology and evolution of TGP. Here, we apply a meta-analysis to the sizable literature on predator-induced TGP (441 effect sizes from 29 species and 49 studies) to explore five hypotheses about the magnitude, form and direction of predator-induced TGP. Hypothesis #1: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with the number of predator cues. Hypothesis #2: the strength of predator-induced TGP should vary with reproductive mode. Hypothesis #3: the strength and direction of predator-induced TGP should vary among offspring phenotypic traits because some traits are more plastic than others. Hypothesis #4: the strength of predator-induced TGP should wane over ontogeny. Hypothesis #5: predator-induced TGP should generate adaptive phenotypes that should be more evident when offspring are themselves exposed to risk. We found strong evidence for predator-induced TGP overall, but no evidence that parental predator exposure causes offspring traits to change in a particular direction. Additionally, we found little evidence in support of any of the specific hypotheses. We infer that the failure to find consistent evidence reflects the heterogeneous nature of the phenomena, and the highly diverse experimental designs used to study it. Together, these findings set an agenda for future work in this area.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorReproductionAnimalsPhenotypeDevelopmental plasticityIntergenerational inheritanceMaternal effectParental effectPredation

Identifiers

PMID36319867
PMCPMC9675678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.