Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36319770›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2022

Synaptic pruning through glial synapse engulfment upon motor learning.

Yosuke M Morizawa, Mami Matsumoto, Yuka Nakashima, Narumi Endo, Tomomi Aida, Hiroshi Ishikane, Kaoru Beppu, Satoru Moritoh, Hitoshi Inada, Noriko Osumi and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Astrocytes at the heart of sleep: from genes to network dynamics.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Yosuke M MorizawaSuper-network Brain Physiology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. ymmorizawa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-3230
Mami MatsumotoSection of Electron Microscopy, Supportive Center for Brain Research, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
Yuka NakashimaSuper-network Brain Physiology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Narumi EndoSuper-network Brain Physiology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tomomi AidaLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2021-4439
Hiroshi IshikaneDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities, Senshu University, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-2255
Kaoru BeppuDivision of Interdisciplinary Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Satoru MoritohDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Hitoshi InadaDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Noriko OsumiDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-6452
Eiji ShigetomiDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-6155
Schuichi KoizumiDepartment of Neuropharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6184-3106
Guang YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-9126
Hirokazu HiraiDepartment of Neurophysiology and Neural Repair, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-4293
Kohichi TanakaLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji F TanakaDivision of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2511-0057
Nobuhiko OhnoDivision of Histology and Cell Biology, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6536-2753
Yugo FukazawaDivision of Brain Structure and Function, Life Science Innovation Center, School of Medical Science, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-8797
Ko MatsuiSuper-network Brain Physiology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. matsui@med.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1068-9705
Tohoku University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Yamanashi · JPColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USGunma University · JPJichi Medical University · JPNagoya City University · JPSenshu University · JPUniversity of Fukui · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic pruning is a fundamental process of neuronal circuit refinement in learning and memory. Accumulating evidence suggests that glia participates in sculpting the neuronal circuits through synapse engulfment. However, whether glial involvement in synaptic pruning has a role in memory formation remains elusive. Using newly developed phagocytosis reporter mice and three-dimensional ultrastructural characterization, we found that synaptic engulfment by cerebellar Bergmann glia (BG) frequently occurred upon cerebellum-dependent motor learning in mice. We observed increases in pre- and postsynaptic nibbling by BG along with a reduction in spine volume after learning. Pharmacological blockade of engulfment with Annexin V inhibited both the spine volume reduction and overnight improvement of motor adaptation. These results indicate that BG contribute to the refinement of the mature cerebellar cortical circuit through synaptic engulfment during motor learning.

Indexed as

NeurogliaSynapsesAnimalsCerebellumMiceNeuronal PlasticityNeurons

Identifiers

PMID36319770
OpenAlexW4308147376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.