Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36319706›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2023

Impact of host age on viral and bacterial communities in a waterbird population.

Sarah C Hill, Sarah François, Julien Thézé, Adrian L Smith, Peter Simmonds, Christopher M Perrins, Lia van der Hoek, Oliver G Pybus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah C Hill *Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK. sahill@rvc.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2995-2596
Sarah François *Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sarah.francois@biology.ox.ac.uk.
Julien ThézéDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8188-9494
Adrian L SmithDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter SimmondsNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Peter Medawar Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK.
Christopher M PerrinsDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lia van der HoekAmsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2803-642X
Oliver G PybusDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK. oliver.pybus@biology.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008806/1Wellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 102427/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust 220414/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife harbour pathogens that can harm human or livestock health and are the source of most emerging infectious diseases. It is rarely considered how changes in wildlife population age-structures or how age-stratified behaviours might alter the level of pathogen detection within a species, or risk of spillover to other species. Micro-organisms that occur in healthy animals can be an important model for understanding and predicting the dynamics of pathogens of greater health concern, which are hard to study in wild populations due to their relative rarity. We therefore used a metagenomic approach to jointly characterise viral and prokaryotic carriage in faeces collected from a healthy wild bird population (Cygnus olor; mute swan) that has been subject to long-term study. Using 223 samples from known individuals allowed us to compare differences in prokaryotic and eukaryotic viral carriage between adults and juveniles at an unprecedented level of detail. We discovered and characterised 77 novel virus species, of which 21% belong putatively to bird-infecting families, and described the core prokaryotic microbiome of C. olor. Whilst no difference in microbiota diversity was observed between juveniles and adult individuals, 50% (4/8) of bird-infecting virus families (picornaviruses, astroviruses, adenoviruses and bornaviruses) and 3.4% (9/267) of prokaryotic families (including Helicobacteraceae, Spirochaetaceae and Flavobacteriaceae families) were differentially abundant and/or prevalent between juveniles and adults. This indicates that perturbations that affect population age-structures of wildlife could alter circulation dynamics and spillover risk of microbes, potentially including pathogens.

Indexed as

Animals, WildAnseriformesAnimalsBirdsHumansMetagenome

Identifiers

PMID36319706
PMCPMC9860062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.