Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36319636›Full record

ArticleLight, science & applications2022

Experimentally unsupervised deconvolution for light-sheet microscopy with propagation-invariant beams.

Philip Wijesinghe, Stella Corsetti, Darren J X Chow, Shuzo Sakata, Kylie R Dunning, Kishan Dholakia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Light, science & applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip WijesingheSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK. pw64@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8378-7261
Stella CorsettiSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-7061
Darren J X ChowRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-4600
Shuzo SakataStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0RE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6796-411X
Kylie R DunningRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0462-6479
Kishan DholakiaSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK. kd1@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6534-9009

Funding

Hospital Research Foundation (The Hospital Research Foundation) C-MCF-58-2019RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M00905X/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/P030017/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/R004854/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deconvolution is a challenging inverse problem, particularly in techniques that employ complex engineered point-spread functions, such as microscopy with propagation-invariant beams. Here, we present a deep-learning method for deconvolution that, in lieu of end-to-end training with ground truths, is trained using known physics of the imaging system. Specifically, we train a generative adversarial network with images generated with the known point-spread function of the system, and combine this with unpaired experimental data that preserve perceptual content. Our method rapidly and robustly deconvolves and super-resolves microscopy images, demonstrating a two-fold improvement in image contrast to conventional deconvolution methods. In contrast to common end-to-end networks that often require 1000-10,000s paired images, our method is experimentally unsupervised and can be trained solely on a few hundred regions of interest. We demonstrate its performance on light-sheet microscopy with propagation-invariant Airy beams in oocytes, preimplantation embryos and excised brain tissue, as well as illustrate its utility for Bessel-beam LSM. This method aims to democratise learned methods for deconvolution, as it does not require data acquisition outwith the conventional imaging protocol.

Identifiers

PMID36319636
PMCPMC9626625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.