Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36319488›Full record

ArticleVaccine2023

Strategic silences, eroded trust: The impact of divergent COVID-19 vaccine sentiments on healthcare workers' relations with peers and patients.

Leonardo W Heyerdahl, Stef Dielen, Hélène Dodion, Carla Van Riet, ToTran Nguyen, Clarissa Simas, Lise Boey, Tarun Kattumana, Nico Vandaele, Heidi J Larson and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Profiling vaccine hesitancy in nursing to tailor public healthcare policies: A cross-sectional international study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Leonardo W HeyerdahlDepartment of Global Health, Anthropology and Ecology of Disease Emergence Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. Electronic address: leonard.heyerdahl@pasteur.fr.
Stef DielenSocio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Hélène DodionSocio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Carla Van RietAccess-To-Medicines Research Centre, KU Leuven, Belgium.
ToTran NguyenSocio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Clarissa SimasVaccine Confidence Project and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Lise BoeyAccess-To-Medicines Research Centre, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Tarun KattumanaAccess-To-Medicines Research Centre, KU Leuven, Belgium; Husserl Archives, Research Center for Phenomenology and Continental Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Nico VandaeleAccess-To-Medicines Research Centre, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Heidi J LarsonVaccine Confidence Project and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Koen Peeters GrietensSocio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium; School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tamara Giles-VernickDepartment of Global Health, Anthropology and Ecology of Disease Emergence Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Charlotte GryseelsSocio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEInnovative Medicines Initiative · BEInstitut Pasteur · FRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBKU Leuven · BENagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolarized debates about Covid-19 vaccination and vaccine mandates for healthcare workers (HCWs) challenge Belgian HCWs ability to discuss Covid-19 vaccine sentiments with peers and patients.Although studies have identified drivers of HCWs vaccine hesitancy, they do not include effects of workplace interactions and have not addressed consequences beyond vaccine coverage.

methodsInterviews and focus group discussions with 74 HCWs practicing in Belgium addressed Covid-19 vaccine sentiments and experiences of discussing vaccination with peers and patients.

resultsMost participating HCWs reported difficulties discussing Covid-19 vaccination with peers and patients. Unvaccinated HCWs often feared that expressing their vaccine sentiments might upset patients or peers and that they would be suspended. Consequently, they used social cues to evaluate others' openness to vaccine-skeptical discourses and avoided discussing vaccines. Surprisingly, some vaccine-confident HCWs hid their vaccine sentiments to avoid peer and patient conflicts. Both vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs observed that unvaccinated patients occasionally received suboptimal care. Suboptimal care was central in unvaccinated HCW unwillingness to express their vaccine sentiments to peers. Both vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs described loss of trust and ruptured social relations with peers and patients holding divergent vaccine sentiments. DISCUSSION: Belgian HCW perceived Covid-19 vaccines as a risky discussion topic and engaged in "strategic silences" around vaccination to maintain functional work relationships and employment in health institutions. Loss of trust between HCW and peers or patients, along with suboptimal patient care based on vaccination status, threaten to weaken Belgium's, and by implication, other health systems, and to catalyze preventable disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelHumansTrustVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36319488
PMCPMC9606030
OpenAlexW4307445630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.