ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022
Detection of dynamic changes in interaural delay by older adults (L).
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sound-induced visual motion perception in older adults: aging enhances audiovisual motion integration.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Audiovisual Synchrony in Left-hemisphere Brain-lesioned Individuals with Aphasia.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Informational Masking in Aging and Brain-lesioned Individuals.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Article
- Aging does not affect auditory motion discrimination based on interaural level differences.i-PerceptionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of older adults (48 to 72) with relatively intact low-frequency hearing to detect the motion of an acoustic source was investigated using dynamically varying interaural delays. Thresholds were measured using a single-interval two-alternative forced-choice task in which listeners determined if the sound source was moving or stationary. Motion thresholds were significantly larger than stationary localization thresholds. No correlation was observed between age and motion-detection ability for the age range tested. An interesting finding was that there were similar thresholds for older and younger adults. Results suggest reliance on dominant low-frequency binaural timing cues unaffected by high-frequency hearing loss in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.