Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36319060›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Process evaluation of in-person, news and social media engagement of a community-based programme Brown Buttabean Motivation (BBM): a research protocol.

Fa'asisila Savila, Anele Bamber, Sandra Smith, Karen V Fernandez, Truely Harding, Dave Letele, Bert van der Werf, Mia Loheni, Warwick Bagg, Boyd Swinburn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fa'asisila SavilaPacific Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anele BamberBBM, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sandra SmithDepartment of Marketing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-1761
Karen V FernandezDepartment of Marketing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6642-1014
Truely HardingFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3391-3928
Dave LeteleBBM, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bert van der WerfEpidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3072-5937
Mia LoheniPacific Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Warwick BaggDepartment of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1401-8191
Boyd SwinburnEpidemiology & Biostatistics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2131-045X
Felicity Goodyear-SmithDepartment of General Practice & Primary Health Care, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand f.goodyear-smith@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-9401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe community group Brown Buttabean Motivation (BBM) initially began to assist Auckland Pasifika and Māori to manage weight problems, predominantly through community-based exercise sessions and social support. BBM's activities expanded over time to include many other components of healthy living in response to community need. With advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, BBM outreach grew to include a foodbank distributing an increasing amount of donated healthy food to families in need, a community kitchen and influenza and COVID-19 vaccine drives. A strong social media presence has served as the main means of communication with the BBM community as well as use of traditional news media (written, radio, television) to further engage with vulnerable members of the community. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study aims to conduct mixed method process evaluation of BBM's community engagement through in-person, social and news media outreach activities with respect to the health and well-being of Pasifika and Māori over time. The project is informed by theoretical constructs including Pacific Fa'afaletui and Fonofale and Māori Te Whare Tapa Whā Māori research frameworks and principles of Kaupapa Māori. It is further framed using the concept of community-driven diffusion of knowledge and engagement through social networks. Data sources include in-person community engagement databases, social and news media outreach data from archived documents and online resources. Empirical data will undergo longitudinal and time series statistical analyses. Qualitative text thematic analyses will be conducted using the software NVivo, Leximancer and AntConc. Image and video visual data will be randomly sampled from two social media platforms. The social media dataset contains almost 8000 visual artefacts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval obtained from University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee UAHPEC 23456. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed publications, disseminated through community meetings and conferences and via BBM social network platforms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12621 00093 1875.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMotivationPandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19General diabetesPreventive medicinePrimary carePublic healthQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36319060
PMCPMC9628661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.