Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36318923›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Cell types and molecular architecture of the Octopus bimaculoides visual system.

Jeremea O Songco-Casey, Gabrielle C Coffing, Denise M Piscopo, Judit R Pungor, Andrew D Kern, Adam C Miller, Cristopher M Niell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Visual computation in the cephalopod brain.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diversity and divergence of two sympatric, sibling octopus species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A non-invasive method to genotype cephalopod sex by quantitative PCR.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeremea O Songco-CaseyInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Gabrielle C CoffingInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Denise M PiscopoInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Judit R PungorInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Andrew D KernInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Adam C MillerInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Cristopher M NiellInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. Electronic address: cniell@uoregon.edu.

Funding

Graduate Training in Genetics Administrative Supplement - Career Curriculum DevelopmentT32GM007413 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GUILLEMIN, KAREN J · 1985 to 2022
$7.8M
Deep learning for population geneticsR01HG010774 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ANDREW D KERN · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
Neural coding and functional organization of the octopus visual systemRF1NS118466 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2020 to 2021
$1.2M
Neural coding and functional organization of the octopus visual systemR01NS118466 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2023 to 2024
$695k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010774NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007413NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118466NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS118466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cephalopods have a remarkable visual system, with a camera-type eye and high acuity vision that they use for a wide range of sophisticated visually driven behaviors. However, the cephalopod brain is organized dramatically differently from that of vertebrates and invertebrates, and beyond neuroanatomical descriptions, little is known regarding the cell types and molecular determinants of their visual system organization. Here, we present a comprehensive single-cell molecular atlas of the octopus optic lobe, which is the primary visual processing structure in the cephalopod brain. We combined single-cell RNA sequencing with RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization to both identify putative molecular cell types and determine their anatomical and spatial organization within the optic lobe. Our results reveal six major neuronal cell classes identified by neurotransmitter/neuropeptide usage, in addition to non-neuronal and immature neuronal populations. We find that additional markers divide these neuronal classes into subtypes with distinct anatomical localizations, revealing further diversity and a detailed laminar organization within the optic lobe. We also delineate the immature neurons within this continuously growing tissue into subtypes defined by evolutionarily conserved developmental genes as well as novel cephalopod- and octopus-specific genes. Together, these findings outline the organizational logic of the octopus visual system, based on functional determinants, laminar identity, and developmental markers/pathways. The resulting atlas presented here details the "parts list" for neural circuits used for vision in octopus, providing a platform for investigations into the development and function of the octopus visual system as well as the evolution of visual processing.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescencecell typescephalopodcomparative neurosciencedevelopmentvisual system

Identifiers

PMID36318923
PMCPMC9815951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.