Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36318827›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

RNAseq Analysis of Brain Aging in Wild Specimens of Short-Lived Turquoise Killifish: Commonalities and Differences With Aging Under Laboratory Conditions.

Mariateresa Mazzetto, Cinzia Caterino, Marco Groth, Elisa Ferrari, Martin Reichard, Mario Baumgart, Alessandro Cellerino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Mariateresa MazzettoBiology of Ageing, Leibniz Institute for Age Research-Fritz Lipmann Institute e.V. (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Cinzia CaterinoBiology of Ageing, Leibniz Institute for Age Research-Fritz Lipmann Institute e.V. (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9928-8283
Marco GrothBiology of Ageing, Leibniz Institute for Age Research-Fritz Lipmann Institute e.V. (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-8990
Elisa FerrariBio@SNS, Scuola Normale Superiore, Department of Neurosciences, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Martin ReichardInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Květná 8, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9306-0074
Mario BaumgartBiology of Ageing, Leibniz Institute for Age Research-Fritz Lipmann Institute e.V. (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-1595
Alessandro CellerinoBiology of Ageing, Leibniz Institute for Age Research-Fritz Lipmann Institute e.V. (FLI), Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3834-0097
Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) · DEScuola Normale Superiore · ITMasaryk University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vast body of studies is available that describe age-dependent gene expression in relation to aging in a number of different model species. These data were obtained from animals kept in conditions with reduced environmental challenges, abundant food, and deprivation of natural sensory stimulation. Here, we compared wild- and captive aging in the short-lived turquoise killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri). These fish inhabit temporary ponds in the African savannah. When the ponds are flooded, eggs hatch synchronously, enabling a precise timing of their individual and population age. We collected the brains of wild fish of different ages and quantified the global age-dependent regulation of transcripts using RNAseq. A major difference between captive and wild populations is that wild populations had unlimited access to food and hence grew to larger sizes and reached asymptotic size more rapidly, enabling the analysis of age-dependent gene expression without the confounding effect of adult brain growth. We found that the majority of differentially expressed genes show the same direction of regulation in wild and captive populations. However, a number of genes were regulated in opposite direction. Genes downregulated in the wild and upregulated in captivity were enriched for terms related to neuronal communication. Genes upregulated in the wild and downregulated in captive conditions were enriched in terms related to DNA replication. Finally, the rate of age-dependent gene regulation was higher in wild animals, suggesting a phenomenon of accelerated aging.

Indexed as

CyprinodontiformesFundulidaeAgingAnimalsAnimals, WildBrainbrain aginggene expressionkillifishNothobranchius furzeriRNAseq

Identifiers

PMID36318827
PMCPMC9641980
OpenAlexW4307971218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.