Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36318799›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2023

Models for Zero-Inflated and Overdispersed Correlated Count Data: An Application to Cigarette Use.

Brian Pittman, Eugenia Buta, Kathleen Garrison, Ralitza Gueorguieva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian PittmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0353-5604
Eugenia ButaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kathleen GarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ralitza GueorguievaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-5973
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Center for the Study of Tobacco Product Use and Addiction (YCSTP) Project 2: Addictive Threshold of Nicotine and the Impact of SweetenersU54DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Nii A Addy · 2018 to 2026
$41.6M
Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
Yale Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceP50DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRISHNAN-SARIN, SUCHITRA, O'MALLEY, STEPHANIE S · 2013 to 2017
$20.6M
Smartband/smartphone-based automatic smoking detection and real time mindfulness interventionR34AT010365 · NCCIH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GARRISON, KATHLEEN A. · 2019 to 2020
$754k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 14CRP18200010FDA HHSNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000142NCCIH NIH HHS NCCIH 1R34AT010365-01NCCIH NIH HHS R34 AT010365NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036151NIDA NIH HHS P50DA036151NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCount outcomes in tobacco research are often analyzed with the Poisson distribution. However, they often exhibit features such as overdispersion (variance larger than expected) and zero inflation (extra zeros) that violate model assumptions. Furthermore, longitudinal studies have repeated measures that generate correlated counts. Failure to account for overdispersion, zero inflation, and correlation can yield incorrect statistical inferences. Thus, it is important to familiarize researchers with proper models for such data. AIMS AND

methodsPoisson and Negative Binomial models with correlated random effects with and without zero inflation are presented. The illustrative data comes from a study comparing a mindfulness training app (Craving to Quit [C2Q], n = 60) with a control app (experience sampling-only app, n = 66) on smoking frequency at 1, 3, and 6 months. Predictors include app, time, the app-by-time interaction, and baseline smoking. Each model is evaluated in terms of accounting for zero inflation, overdispersion, and correlation in the data. Emphasis is placed on evaluating model fit, subject-specific interpretation of effects, and choosing an appropriate model.

resultsThe hurdle Poisson model provided the best fit to the data. Smoking abstinence rates were 33%, 32%, and 28% at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, with variance larger than expected by a factor >7 at each follow-up. Individuals on C2Q were less likely to achieve abstinence across time but likely to smoke fewer cigarettes if smoking.

conclusionsThe models presented are specifically suited for analyzing correlated count outcomes and account for zero inflation and overdispersion. We provide guidance to researchers on the use of these models to better inform nicotine and tobacco research. IMPLICATIONS: In tobacco research, count outcomes are often measured repeatedly on the same subject and thus correlated. Such outcomes often have many zeros and exhibit large variances relative to the mean. Analyzing such data require models specifically suited for correlated counts. The presented models and guidelines could improve the rigor of the analysis of correlated count data and thus increase the impact of studies in nicotine and tobacco research using such outcomes.

Indexed as

NicotineTobacco ProductsHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, StatisticalPoisson DistributionNicotine

Identifiers

PMID36318799
PMCPMC10077942
OpenAlexW4307968563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.