Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36318531›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Intake of nutrients (polyunsaturated fatty acids, tocols, and carotenes) and storage efficiency in different slow-growing chickens genotypes reared in extensive systems.

Simona Mattioli, Alice Cartoni Mancinelli, Alessandro Dal Bosco, Claudia Ciarelli, Monica Guarino Amato, Elisa Angelucci, Diletta Chiattelli, Cesare Castellini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simona MattioliDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5063-6785
Alice Cartoni MancinelliDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alessandro Dal BoscoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Claudia CiarelliDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment-DAFNAE, University of Padova, Agripolis, Viale dell'Università, Legnaro (PD), Italy.
Monica Guarino AmatoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Livestock Production and Aquaculture, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8044-5488
Elisa AngelucciDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Diletta ChiattelliDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Cesare CastelliniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An extensive rearing system (ERS) for poultry requires an outdoor run, which enhances the foraging activity of chickens. Slow-growing (SG) strains are more adapted to ERS than fast-growing (FG); and generally, have higher levels of bioactive compounds in their meat. The aim of this paper was to assess the storage efficiency of n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), tocols and carotenes in the meat of seven commercial SG genotypes (SG1-7). One hundred SG chicks/strain of both sexes were included and their walking activity (High- or Low-W) was classified: SG1-4, HW comprised more than 10% of the time budget, and SG5-7, less than 10% (LW). Chickens were reared in pens (4 pens/strain) with indoor (0.10 m2/bird) and outdoor (4 m2/bird) areas, and they were fed the same diet ad libitum (starter feed for 1-21 d, grower feed from 22 d to slaughter at 81 d). The chickens were weighed weekly; feed consumption and grass intake were also estimated. At 81 days of age, 32 chickens/genotype were selected on the basis of the average weight (1:1, M:F) and slaughtered. The breast, thigh and drumstick meat were excised from 30 carcasses/genotype, sampled and stored at -20°C until analysis. Nutrients (e.g., n-3, n-6, carotenes and tocols) of feed, grass and meat were analyzed. The storage efficiency of nutrients was estimated as the ratio between the amount deposited in the body muscles (OUT) and the dietary intake (feed and grass, IN). The genotype affected chickens foraging behavior and the intake of nutrients. For SG1, SG2 and SG3, more than 50% of the intake of n-3 came from grass, whereas in the other genotypes, less than 20%. Accordingly, chickens that foraged more showed better meat nutritional profiles (less fat, more n-3 and antioxidants), which, in ERS, was ascribed to grass ingestion. However, the storage efficiency of nutrients into meat was inversely correlated with the grass intake: strains with higher grass intake (SG1, SG2, and SG3) had lower storage rates. Several hypotheses were proposed to explain these trends.

Indexed as

CarotenoidsChickensAnimal FeedAnimalsDietFatty AcidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFemaleGenotypeMaleMeatNutrientsCarotenoidsFatty AcidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedNutrients

Identifiers

PMID36318531
PMCPMC9624413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.