Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36318468›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2023

Thumbs up or thumbs down: neural processing of social feedback and links to social motivation in adolescent girls.

Megan M Davis, Haina H Modi, Haley V Skymba, Megan K Finnegan, Katherine Haigler, Eva H Telzer, Karen D Rudolph

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unfiltered Access, Unseen Harms: A Developmental and Public Health Critique of Digital Rights Discourse.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megan M DavisDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-4632
Haina H ModiDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Haley V SkymbaDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Megan K FinneganDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4095-1225
Katherine HaiglerHuman Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA.
Eva H TelzerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Karen D RudolphDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Social Sensitivity and Depression in Peer-Victimized Girls: Insights from NeuroscienceR03MH105655 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI RUDOLPH, KAREN D, TELZER, EVA HAIMO · 2015 to 2016
$159k
NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH105655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of rapid biological and psychological development, characterized by increasing emotional reactivity and risk-taking, especially in peer contexts. Theories of adolescent neural development suggest that the balance in sensitivity across neural threat, reward and regulatory systems contributes to these changes. Building on previous research, this study used a novel social feedback task to explore activation and functional connectivity in the context of social threat and reward in a sample of mid-adolescent girls (n = 86, Mage = 16.32). When receiving negative peer feedback, adolescents showed elevated activation in, and amygdala connectivity with, social processing regions [e.g. medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and temporoparietal junction (TPJ)]. When receiving positive feedback, adolescents showed elevated activation in social and reward (e.g. mPFC and ventromedial prefrontal cortex) processing regions and less striatum-cerebellum connectivity. To understand the psychological implications of neural activation and co-activation, we examined associations between neural processing of threat and reward and self-reported social goals. Avoidance goals predicted elevated amygdala and striatum connectivity with social processing regions [e.g. medial temporal gyrus (MTG)], whereas approach goals predicted deactivation in social processing regions (e.g. MTG/TPJ and precuneus), highlighting the importance of considering individual differences in sensitivity to social threat and reward in adolescence.

Indexed as

MotivationPrefrontal CortexAdolescentAmygdalaBrain MappingFeedbackFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRewardadolescenceneuroimagingsocial evaluationsocial goals

Identifiers

PMID36318468
PMCPMC10036875
OpenAlexW4307844069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.