Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36318454›Full record

ReviewNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2023

Kidney utilization in the Netherlands - do we optimally use our donor organs?

Rianne Schutter, Willemijn A L Vrijlandt, Gelske M Weima, Robert A Pol, Jan-Stephan F Sanders, Meindert J Crop, Henri G D Leuvenink, Cyril Moers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewCase Reports
In one paragraph

Review in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding the dynamics of deceased organ donation and utilization in Colombia.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rianne SchutterDepartment of Surgery - Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9461-8060
Willemijn A L VrijlandtDepartment of Surgery - Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gelske M WeimaDepartment of Surgery - Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robert A PolDepartment of Surgery - Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Stephan F SandersDepartment of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Meindert J CropDepartment of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henri G D LeuveninkDepartment of Surgery - Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cyril MoersDepartment of Surgery - Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo ensure optimal utilization of deceased donor kidneys, it is important to understand the precise reasons why kidneys are discarded. In this study we aimed to obtain a comprehensive overview of kidney utilization and discard during the entire donation process in the Netherlands.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study we analysed kidney utilization of 3856 kidneys in the Netherlands between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. For every kidney that was not transplanted, we determined the moment of and reason for discard through a unique case-by-case assessment.

resultsKidney discard according to the traditional definition (procured but not transplanted) was 7.8%. However, when kidneys that seemed medically suitable at the beginning of the donation process were also included, many more potential donor kidneys were lost and the total non-utilization was 24.4%. Subjectively presumed impaired organ quality was responsible for 34.2% of all discarded kidneys. Two-thirds of kidneys discarded due to acute kidney injury (AKI) had only AKI stage 1 or 2.

conclusionThe classical definition of organ discard underestimates the non-utilization of deceased donor kidneys. Strategies to improve kidney utilization could be a revision of the maximum allowed agonal time in donation after circulatory death, careful consideration in reporting and accepting kidneys from donors with AKI and a prospectively filled registry of detailed organ discard reasons, including the 'silent' non-utilization before procurement.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryKidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementDonor SelectionGraft SurvivalHumansKidneyNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesTissue Donorsdiscardkidney utilizationorgan donation

Identifiers

PMID36318454
PMCPMC9976738
OpenAlexW4307847364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.