Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36318326›Full record

ArticleHandbook of experimental pharmacology2023

Natural Products Drug Discovery: On Silica or In-Silico?

Hye Kyong Kim, Young Hae Choi, Robert Verpoorte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hye Kyong KimNatural Products Laboratory, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Young Hae ChoiNatural Products Laboratory, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert VerpoorteNatural Products Laboratory, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. verpoort@chem.leidenuniv.nl.
Leiden University · NLKyung Hee University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products have been the most important source for drug development throughout the human history. Over time, the formulation of drugs has evolved from crude drugs to refined chemicals. In modern drug discovery, conventional natural products lead-finding usually uses a top-down approach, namely bio-guided fractionation. In this approach, the crude extracts are separated by chromatography and resulting fractions are tested for activity. Subsequently, active fractions are further refined until a single active compound is obtained. However, this is a painstakingly slow and expensive process. Among the alternatives that have been developed to improve this situation, metabolomics has proved to yield interesting results having been applied successfully to drug discovery in the last two decades. The metabolomics-based approach in lead-finding comprises two steps: (1) in-depth chemical profiling of target samples, e.g. plant extracts, and bioactivity assessment, (2) correlation of the chemical and biological data by chemometrics. In the first step of this approach, the target samples are chemically profiled in an untargeted manner to detect as many compounds as possible. So far, NMR spectroscopy, LC-MS, GC-MS, and MS/MS spectrometry are the most common profiling tools. The profile data are correlated with the biological activity with the help of various chemometric methods such as multivariate data analysis. This in-silico analysis has a high potential to replace or complement conventional on-silica bioassay-guided fractionation as it will greatly reduce the number of bioassays, and thus time and costs. Moreover, it may reveal synergistic mechanisms, when present, something for which the classical top-down approach is clearly not suited. This chapter aims to give an overview of successful approaches based on the application of chemical profiling with chemometrics in natural products drug discovery.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidDrug DiscoveryHumansMetabolomicsPlant ExtractsBiological ProductsPlant ExtractsAntibioticsanticanceranti-inflammatoryChemometricsCorrelation analysisDiscriminant analysisIn-silicoMetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID36318326
OpenAlexW4307841603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.