ArticleExperimental brain research2022
Evaluation of motor learning in predictable loading task using a force sense presentation device.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neural circuits connecting the cerebellum with the cerebral cortex are important for both motor and cognitive functions. Therefore, assessment of cerebellar function is clinically important for patients with various motor and cognitive dysfunctions. Cerebellum-dependent motor learning has been studied using various tasks. The most widely used tasks are visuomotor adaptation tasks, in which subjects are required to make movements in two dimensions. Studies using simpler tasks of one-dimensional movement, which are easier for patients with motor problems to perform, have suggested that anticipatory responses in these tasks are useful to evaluate cerebellum-dependent motor control or motor learning. In this study, we examined whether the motor learning process can be evaluated in a simple loading task. Using space interface device for artificial reality (SPIDAR), a constant downward force was loaded to subjects' hands in a predictable condition, and the vertical movement of the hand was recorded. The hand deflection from the initial position was displayed on a screen for visual feedback information. We examined effects of repeated loading task training (90 times) on hand movements, by analyzing a small upward movement just before loading (anticipatory response) and a large downward movement after loading in each trial. We found that the repeated training lowered the time constant of upward movement and reduced the amplitude and time-to-peak of downward movement. These training effects were maintained into the next day. Furthermore, we found that loading task training with eyes closed was also effective, which indicates that proprioceptive information is enough for improvement of performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.