Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36318234›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2023

Linking Personalized Brain Atrophy to Schizophrenia Network and Treatment Response.

Gong-Jun Ji, Andrew Zalesky, Yingru Wang, Kongliang He, Lu Wang, Rongrong Du, Jinmei Sun, Tongjian Bai, Xingui Chen, Yanghua Tian and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Distinct Biotypes of Visual Perception in Major Depressive Disorder.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gong-Jun JiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Andrew ZaleskyDepartments of Psychiatry and Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Yingru WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Kongliang HeAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Cognition and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Hefei, 230032, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Rongrong DuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Jinmei SunDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Tongjian BaiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Xingui ChenDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Yanghua TianDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Chunyan ZhuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, The School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Anhui Medical University · CNAnhui Mental Health Center · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisSchizophrenia manifests with marked heterogeneity in both clinical presentation and underlying biology. Modeling individual differences within clinical cohorts is critical to translate knowledge reliably into clinical practice. We hypothesized that individualized brain atrophy in patients with schizophrenia may explain the heterogeneous outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). STUDY

designThe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 797 healthy subjects and 91 schizophrenia patients (between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020) were retrospectively selected from our hospital database. The healthy subjects were used to establish normative reference ranges for cortical thickness as a function of age and sex. Then, a schizophrenia patient's personalized atrophy map was computed as vertex-wise deviations from the normative model. Each patient's atrophy network was mapped using resting-state functional connectivity MRI from a subgroup of healthy subjects (n = 652). In total 52 of the 91 schizophrenia patients received rTMS in a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Their longitudinal symptom changes were adopted to test the clinical utility of the personalized atrophy map.

resultsThe personalized atrophy maps were highly heterogeneous across patients, but functionally converged to a putative schizophrenia network that comprised regions implicated by previous group-level findings. More importantly, retrospective analysis of rTMS-RCT data indicated that functional connectivity of the personalized atrophy maps with rTMS targets was significantly associated with the symptom outcomes of schizophrenia patients.

conclusionsNormative modeling can aid in mapping the personalized atrophy network associated with treatment outcomes of patients with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

BrainSchizophreniaAtrophyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationfunctional connectivitymagnetic resonance imagingnormative modelingschizophreniatranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36318234
PMCPMC9810021
OpenAlexW4307793328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.