ArticleJAMA network open2022
Use of US Food and Drug Administration Expedited Drug Development and Review Programs by Orphan and Nonorphan Novel Drugs Approved From 2008 to 2021.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of United States Food and Drug Administration Approval of Cell and Gene Therapies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Real-World Clinical Oncology Outcomes Associated with the Accelerated Approval Pathway.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Expedited pathway portfolios, trial complexity, and FDA approval timelines in oncology and neurology: A comparative analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- The impact of China's drug regulatory reform on access to orphan drugs: a cross-sectional study of diseases listed in the rare disease catalog.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Drug repositioning as a promising approach for the eradication of emerging and re-emerging viral agents.Molecular diversity · 2025Review
- Flexibility over rigor: stakeholder acceptance of the limitations of confirmatory studies following accelerated approval.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Expediting treatments in the 21st century: orphan drugs and accelerated approvals.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation Reduced Late-Stage Drug Development Time.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2024Article
- Article
- A Comparison of the Antioxidant Potential and Metabolite Analysis of Marine Fungi Associated with the Red AlgaeAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Orphan Drug Act at 40: Legislative Triumph and the Challenges of Success.The Milbank quarterly · 2024Article
- Trends in oncology drug lags in Japan from 2001 to 2020: A cross-sectional study.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- The urgent need for conducting clinical trials in pediatric nephrology globally.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- Article
- Errors in Figure 1.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Advances in orphan drug development for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a 2025 update from the FDA and EMA.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has 4 programs that can be used alone or in combination to expedite drug availability: Accelerated Approval, Breakthrough Therapy, Fast Track, and Priority Review. Drugs using these programs can include novel drugs, which do not contain a previously FDA-approved active moiety, and orphan drugs, intended for diseases or conditions affecting fewer than 200 000 people; to date, no comprehensive evaluation of how these programs have been used in combination has been published. Objective: To assess how often and in what combinations expedited programs are used in the development and review of approved novel biologics and small-molecule drugs, stratified by orphan drug status and indication. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study evaluated all novel drugs that were FDA approved between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the frequency with which expedited programs were used and in what combinations, stratified by orphan drug status and drug type (small molecule vs therapeutic biologic). The unit of analysis was the novel drug-indication pair because a drug can be approved for multiple indications, each of which may use a different expedited program or differ in orphan drug status. Results: The study included 581 novel drug-indication pairs approved during the 14-year study period; 252 (43.4%) were orphan drugs, 139 (23.9%) were therapeutic biologics, and 442 (76.1%) were small-molecule drugs. Use of at least 1 expedited program increased from 11 of 26 drug-indication pairs (42.3%) in 2008 to 41 of 55 (74.5%) in 2021. Of the 363 approved drug-indication pairs using at least 1 expedited program, 225 (62.0%) were orphan drugs; at least 1 expedited program was used by 97 of the 139 approved biologic drugs (69.8%) and by 266 of the 442 approved small-molecule drugs (60.2%). Eighty-two of the 581 novel drug-indication pairs (14.1%) used the Accelerated Approval Program; of those, 65 (79.3%) were oncology drugs and 70 (85.4%) had an orphan designation. Conclusions and Relevance: The study showed that use of the FDA's expedited programs to bring novel drugs to market in the US increased from 2008 to 2021. The findings suggest that this trend is likely to continue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.