ArticleJAMA2022
Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Article in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Weight and Procedural Abortion Complications: A Systematic Review.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Pooled it
- Crisis pregnancy center messaging in the post-Dobbs era.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Experiences of Abortion Travel.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Out-of-State Travel for Abortion Care Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Geographic Access to Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities by State Abortion Policy.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Perceived Importance of Abortion Care Features and Access to Telehealth Technologies Among Medication Abortion Patients by Abortion Care Model: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Knowledge of Remote Medication Abortion Among Patients Traveling From States That Restrict Abortion.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Access to Abortion for US Military Service Members in 2024 After theAmerican journal of public health · 2026Article
- Observational
- Article
- Reasons for Choosing Telehealth Abortion Based on Food Insecurity Status: United States, 2021-2022.American journal of public health · 2026Article
- State-Level Disparities in Residency Applications After Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- "Just Stay Home and Wait It Out": Exploring Challenges Accessing Care for Miscarriage in Indiana.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2026Article
- "It Was So Easy in a Situation That's So Hard": Structural Stigma and Telehealth Abortion.Journal of health and social behavior · 2026Article
- Documentation of Pregnancy Options Counseling in a Pediatric Emergency Department and Outpatient General Pediatric Clinic: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Clinical pediatrics · 2026Article
- Time Pressures and Sociocultural Constraints Affecting Access to Early Abortion Care Under Texas' "6-Week" Ban.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2026Article
- Unwilling to Disclose: Privacy and Pregnancy in Post-Public opinion quarterly · 2026Article
- Obstetric-Related Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act Violations and No Health Exception Bans.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Travel From Native Lands to US Abortion Facilities Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Distance to Care and Telehealth Abortion Demand After Dobbs.JAMA network open · 2025Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Abortion facility closures resulted in a substantial decrease in access to abortion care in the US. Objectives: To investigate the changes in travel time to the nearest abortion facility after the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (referred to hereafter as Dobbs) US Supreme Court decision. Design, Setting, and Participants: Repeated cross-sectional spatial analysis of travel time from each census tract in the contiguous US (n = 82 993) to the nearest abortion facility (n = 1134) listed in the Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health database. Census tract boundaries and demographics were defined by the 2020 American Community Survey. The spatial analysis compared access during the pre-Dobbs period (January-December 2021) with the post-Dobbs period (September 2022) for the estimated 63 718 431 females aged 15 to 44 years (reproductive age for this analysis) in the US (excluding Alaska and Hawaii). Exposures: The Dobbs ruling and subsequent state laws restricting abortion procedures. The pre-Dobbs period measured abortion access to all facilities providing abortions in 2021. Post-Dobbs abortion access was measured by simulating the closure of all facilities in the 15 states with existing total or 6-week abortion bans in effect as of September 30, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Median and mean changes in surface travel time (eg, car, public transportation) to an abortion facility in the post-Dobbs period compared with the pre-Dobbs period and the total percentage of females of reproductive age living more than 60 minutes from abortion facilities during the pre- and post-Dobbs periods. Results: Of 1134 abortion facilities in the US (at least 1 in every state; 8 in Alaska and Hawaii excluded), 749 were considered active during the pre-Dobbs period and 671 were considered active during a simulated post-Dobbs period. Median (IQR) and mean (SD) travel times to pre-Dobbs abortion facilities were estimated to be 10.9 (4.3-32.4) and 27.8 (42.0) minutes. Travel time to abortion facilities in the post-Dobbs period significantly increased (paired sample t test P <.001) to an estimated median (IQR) of 17.0 (4.9-124.5) minutes and a mean (SD) of and 100.4 (161.5) minutes. In the post-Dobbs period, an estimated 33.3% (sensitivity interval, 32.3%-34.8%) of females of reproductive age lived in a census tract more than 60 minutes from an abortion facility compared with 14.6.% (sensitivity interval, 13.0%-16.9%) of females of reproductive age in the pre-Dobbs period. Conclusions and Relevance: In this repeated cross-sectional spatial analysis, estimated travel time to abortion facilities in the US was significantly greater in the post-Dobbs period after accounting for the closure of abortion facilities in states with total or 6-week abortion bans compared with the pre-Dobbs period, during which all facilities providing abortions in 2021 were considered active.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.