ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2023
Clinical utility of a new protocol of cardiac computed tomography in dogs.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anaesthetic Management Including Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine and Butorphanol in Dogs Undergoing ECG-Gated Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Case Series.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of a new protocol of cardiac computed tomography in dogs.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe characteristics of non-electrocardiography- and electrocardiography-gated multidetector computed tomography have not been extensively studied in veterinary clinics but it can be useful for cardiac imaging. This study aimed to ascertain the differences between non-electrocardiography and electrocardiography gating methods and to establish their clinical utility based on patient history.
methodsSix client-owned dogs (two with patent ductus arteriosus, two with heart base tumour, one with pericardial mesothelioma, and one with normal health) were included in this study. All the dogs were examined using a non-electrocardiography-gated scan, followed by a retrospective electrocardiography-gated scan. Images were reviewed to determine the optimal scan timing and R-R interval in non-electrocardiography- and electrocardiography-gated images, respectively, for detailed coronary artery imaging, diagnostic quality of the best coronary artery visualisation in non-electrocardiography- and electrocardiography-gated images through visual assessment of the main coronary artery branches, and branching patterns of the left coronary artery. Further, we compared the size and margin demarcation of the heart or pericardial lesions in non-electrocardiography- and electrocardiography-gated images obtained from patients with heart or pericardial tumours.
resultsThe optimal scan timing and R-R interval were the second-scan timing and end-diastole (70%-90%), respectively. Second-scan non-electrocardiography-gated images allowed coronary artery evaluation, indicating high-grade quality in visual assessment, except for the septal branch. Electrocardiography-gated images, but not non-ECG-gated images, clearly revealed pericardial nodules in two dogs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest the respective clinical utilities of non-electrocardiography- or electrocardiography-gated imaging using high-slice cardiac computed tomography based on patient history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.