Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36317972›Full record

ReviewPediatrics2022

Nutritional Considerations for the Neonate With Congenital Heart Disease.

Kimberly I Mills, Jae H Kim, Kristi Fogg, Nimrod Goldshtrom, Eric M Graham, Jasmeet Kataria-Hale, Scott W Osborne, Mayte Figueroa

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Human milk and breastfeeding at the first oral feed for infants with critical congenital heart disease: a multi-institutional study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Post-Pyloric Administration of Rivaroxaban With Therapeutic Monitoring in Pediatric Cardiac Patients: Experience in 3 Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly I MillsDivision of Cardiovascular Critical Care, Department of Cardiology, Harvard Medical School and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jae H KimDivision of Neonatology, Perinatal Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Kristi FoggDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Nimrod GoldshtromDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Eric M GrahamDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Jasmeet Kataria-HaleDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Mission Children's Hospital, Asheville, North Carolina.
Scott W OsborneSection of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Mayte FigueroaDivision of Cardiology and Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, St Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Medical University of South Carolina · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USHarvard University · USMission Children's Hospital · USMorgan Stanley Children's Hospital · USSt. Louis Children's Hospital · USTexas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

RESEARCH METHODS IN PEDIATRICS HEART DISEASET32HL007572 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI Sarah D DE FERRANTI, Jane W. Newburger · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of nutrition in managing critically ill infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) is foundational to optimizing short- and long-term health outcomes. Growth failure and malnutrition are common in infants with CHD. The etiology of growth failure in this population is often multifactorial and may be related to altered metabolic demands, compromised blood flow to the intestine leading to nutrient malabsorption, cellular hypoxia, inadequate energy intake, and poor oral-motor skills. A dearth of high-quality studies and gaps in previously published guidelines have led to wide variability in nutrition practices that are locally driven. This review provides recommendations from the nutrition subgroup of the Neonatal Cardiac Care Collaborative for best evidence-based practices in the provision of nutritional support in infants with CHD. The review of evidence and recommendations focused on 6 predefined areas of clinical care for a target population of infants <6 months with CHD admitted to the ICU or inpatient ward. These areas include energy needs, nutrient requirements, enteral nutrition, feeding practice, parenteral nutrition, and outcomes. Future progress will be directed at quality improvement efforts to optimize perioperative nutrition management with an increasing emphasis on individualized care based on nutritional status, cardiorespiratory physiology, state of illness, and other vulnerabilities.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionHeart Defects, CongenitalCritical IllnessHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNutritional RequirementsNutritional StatusNutritional SupportParenteral Nutrition

Identifiers

PMID36317972
PMCPMC11827043
OpenAlexW4308058526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.