Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36317885›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022

Clinical Performance of the Osmotic Shock-MALDI MS Method to Detect Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase in Clinical Isolates.

Saeyoung Lee, Seohyun Hwang, Dong Huey Cheon, Heejung Jang, Won Suk Yang, Min Jin Kim, SunHwa Lee, Je-Hyun Baek

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacological advances inJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saeyoung LeeResearch and Development Center for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea.
Seohyun HwangResearch and Development Center for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong Huey CheonResearch and Development Center for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea.
Heejung JangResearch and Development Center for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea.
Won Suk YangResearch and Development Center for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea.
Min Jin KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea.
SunHwa LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea.
Je-Hyun BaekResearch and Development Center for Clinical Mass Spectrometry, Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4974-8397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization recently highlighted the serious worldwide problem of the emergence of antibiotic-resistant or antibiotic multidrug-resistant bacteria. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, including carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), are major antibiotic-resistant bacteria that can be identified by various methods, including antibiotic susceptibility testing, PCR, and immunologic assays. However, there is a need for a faster, more accurate, low-cost, and easy method to detect CPE strains. We previously developed an osmotic shock matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (OS-MALDI MS) method for directly detecting intact Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) using osmotic shock cell lysis. In this study, we evaluated the OS-MALDI MS method and compared it with two other methods (octyl-glucoside-aided direct KPC detection method [OG-MALDI MS] and Bruker's MBT subtyping module indirect method [MBT-SM MALDI MS]). We first completed an analytical performance evaluation of the OS-MALDI MS method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Clinical testing was performed with 437 clinical isolates, including 292 KPC-producing bacteria and 145 non-KPC-producing bacteria. The OS-MALDI MS method exhibited 95.9% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and 100.0% precision for detecting KPC. Accuracy of the OS-MALDI MS, OG-MALDI MS, and MBT-SM MALDI MS methods was 97.3%, 55.9%, and 50.2%, respectively. In conclusion, the OS-MALDI MS method clearly outperformed the other methods, exhibiting the highest accuracy and sensitivity of the three methods. We propose the OS-MALDI MS method as a practical, useful method for clinic environments, which may help guide appropriate antibiotic treatment and contribute to the prevention of the spread of CPE.

Indexed as

beta-LactamasesKlebsiella pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOsmotic PressureSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemasecarbapenemaseKlebsiella pneumoniaeKPCMALDI MSosmotic lysis

Identifiers

PMID36317885
PMCPMC9667762
OpenAlexW4307838489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.