Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36317821›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2022

Peer community health workers improve HIV testing and ART linkage among key populations in Zambia: retrospective observational results from the Z-CHECK project, 2019-2020.

Brianna R Lindsay, Linah Mwango, Mona-Gekanju Toeque, Siphiwe Lucy Malupande, Elizabeth Nkhuwa, Clement Nchimunya Moonga, Andrew Chilambe, Henry Sakala, Ina Kafunda, Pawel Olowski and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Brianna R LindsayCenter for International Health Education and Biosecurity, MGIC-an affiliate of the University of Maryland Baltimore, Lusaka, Zambia.
Linah MwangoCiheb Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Mona-Gekanju ToequeCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6059-3616
Siphiwe Lucy MalupandeCiheb Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Elizabeth NkhuwaCiheb Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Clement Nchimunya MoongaCentre for Infectious Disease, Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Andrew ChilambeCiheb Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Henry SakalaCenter for International Health Education and Biosecurity, MGIC-an affiliate of the University of Maryland Baltimore, Lusaka, Zambia.
Ina KafundaCenter for International Health Education and Biosecurity, MGIC-an affiliate of the University of Maryland Baltimore, Lusaka, Zambia.
Pawel OlowskiCenter for International Health Education and Biosecurity, MGIC-an affiliate of the University of Maryland Baltimore, Lusaka, Zambia.
Adebayo OlufunsoCenter for International Health Education and Biosecurity, MGIC-an affiliate of the University of Maryland Baltimore, Lusaka, Zambia.
Jackson OkukuU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nzali KancheyaU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Daliso MumbaNational AIDS/TB/STI Council Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lottie HachaambwaCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Robb ShenebergerCenter for International Health Education and Biosecurity, MGIC-an affiliate of the University of Maryland Baltimore, Lusaka, Zambia.
Natalia BlancoCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3157-1119
Marie-Claude LavoieCenter for International Health, Education, and Biosecurity, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3315-6207
Cassidy W ClaassenCenter for International Health Education and Biosecurity, MGIC-an affiliate of the University of Maryland Baltimore, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0001-5059-7894

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionZambia has made tremendous progress towards HIV epidemic control; however, gaps remain among key populations (KPs), such as female sex workers (FSWs), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID) and people in prisons and enclosed settings due to cultural, social and legal barriers. The University of Maryland, Baltimore Zambia Community HIV Epidemic Control for Key Populations (Z-CHECK) project aimed to improve HIV case-finding, linkage and treatment adherence at the community level for KPs in Zambia. We describe Z-CHECK strategies and examine HIV positivity yield and antiretroviral therapy (ART) linkage among KPs to inform ongoing programme improvement.

methodsZ-CHECK recruited, trained and deployed peer community health workers (CHWs) for KP groups, with ongoing mentorship in community engagement. CHWs offered HIV testing in safe spaces and escorted newly HIV-diagnosed clients for same-day ART initiation. Z-CHECK also reached out to KP community leaders and gatekeepers for KP mobilization and trained healthcare workers (HCWs) on KP services and sensitivity. We conducted a retrospective observational review of routinely collected aggregate data for KPs aged ≥15 years at high risk for HIV transmission across five districts in Zambia from January 2019 to December 2020.

resultsZ-CHECK provided HIV testing for 9211 KPs, of whom 2227 were HIV positive (positivity yield, 24%). Among these, 1901 (85%) were linked to ART; linkage for MSM, FSW, PWID and people in prisons and enclosed settings was 95%, 89%, 86% and 65%, respectively. Programme strategies that contributed to high positivity yield and linkage included the use of peer KP CHWs, social network testing strategies and opportunities for same-day ART initiation. Challenges to programme implementation included stigma and discrimination among HCWs, as well as KP CHW attrition, which may be explained by high mobility.

conclusionsPeer CHWs were highly effective at reaching KP communities, identifying persons living with HIV and linking them to care. Engaging KP community gatekeepers resulted in high diffusion of health messages and increased access to health resources. The mobility of CHWs and HCWs is a challenge for programme implementation. Innovative interventions are needed to support PWID and people in prisons and enclosed settings.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesSex WorkersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHIV TestingHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesZambiaART linkagefemale sex workersHIV testing yieldmen who have sex with menpeople in prisons and enclosed settingspeople who inject drugs

Identifiers

PMID36317821
PMCPMC9624072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.