Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36317275›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2023

Attention as a multi-level system of weights and balances.

William Narhi-Martinez, Blaire Dube, Julie D Golomb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Predictability reduces event file retrieval.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  17. Attention as a multi-level system of weights and balances.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William Narhi-MartinezDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Blaire DubeDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Julie D GolombDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-0702

Funding

Neural and perceptual mechanisms of spatial stability across eye movementsR01EY025648 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie D Golomb · 2015 to 2026
$4.5M
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences 1848939Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PDF)NEI NIH HHS 2R01-EY025648NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This opinion piece is part of a collection on the topic: "What is attention?" Despite the word's place in the common vernacular, a satisfying definition for "attention" remains elusive. Part of the challenge is there exist many different types of attention, which may or may not share common mechanisms. Here we review this literature and offer an intuitive definition that draws from aspects of prior theories and models of attention but is broad enough to recognize the various types of attention and modalities it acts upon: attention as a multi-level system of weights and balances. While the specific mechanism(s) governing the weighting/balancing may vary across levels, the fundamental role of attention is to dynamically weigh and balance all signals-both externally-generated and internally-generated-such that the highest weighted signals are selected and enhanced. Top-down, bottom-up, and experience-driven factors dynamically impact this balancing, and competition occurs both within and across multiple levels of processing. This idea of a multi-level system of weights and balances is intended to incorporate both external and internal attention and capture their myriad of constantly interacting processes. We review key findings and open questions related to external attention guidance, internal attention and working memory, and broader attentional control (e.g., ongoing competition between external stimuli and internal thoughts) within the framework of this analogy. We also speculate about the implications of failures of attention in terms of weights and balances, ranging from momentary one-off errors to clinical disorders, as well as attentional development and degradation across the lifespan. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Attention Neuroscience > Cognition.

Indexed as

CognitionMemory, Short-TermHumansattentionbiased competitiondistractiontop-downworking memory

Identifiers

PMID36317275
PMCPMC9840663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.