Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36317192›Full record

ArticleJournal of smoking cessation2020

Who are we missing with EHR-Based Smoking Cessation Treatments? A Descriptive Study of Patients who Smoke and Do Not Regularly Visit Primary Care Clinics.

Margaret Nolan, Deejay Zwaga, Danielle McCarthy, Christian Kastman, Timothy Baker, Mark Zehner, Stevens Smith, Michael Fiore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of smoking cessation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Margaret NolanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
Deejay ZwagaCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
Danielle McCarthyCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
Christian KastmanGroup Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin.
Timothy BakerCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
Mark ZehnerCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
Stevens SmithCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
Michael FioreCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.

Funding

Transforming The Treatment of Tobacco Use in Health Care: Seizing The Potential of the Electronic Health Record to Deliver Comprehensive Chronic Care Treatment for SmokingR35CA197573 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MICHAEL C FIORE · 2015 to 2026
$10.7M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Most tobacco treatment efforts target healthcare settings, since about 75% of smokers in the United States visit a primary care provider annually. Yet, 25% of patients may be missed by such targeting. Aims: To describe patients who smoke but infrequently visit primary care -- their characteristics, rates of successful telephone contact, and acceptance of tobacco treatment. Methods: Tobacco Cessation Outreach Specialists (TCOS) "cold-called" those without a primary care visit in the past year, offering tobacco dependence treatment. Age, sex, insurance status, race, ethnicity, EHR patient-portal status and outreach outcomes were reported. Results: Of 3,407 patients identified as smokers in a health system registry, 565 (16.6%) had not seen any primary care provider in the past year. Among 271 of those called, 143 (53%) were successfully reached and 33 (23%) set a quit date. Those without visits tended to be younger, male, some-day versus every-day smokers (42 vs. 44 yrs., p = 0.004; 48% vs. 40% female, p=0.0002, and 21% vs. 27% some-day, p=0.003), and less active on the EHR patient portal (33% vs. 40%, p =0.001). Conclusions: A substantial proportion of patients who smoke are missed by traditional tobacco treatment interventions that require a primary care visit, yet many are receptive to quit smoking treatment offers.

Identifiers

PMID36317192
PMCPMC9618156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.