Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36317162›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2022

The Burden of Metastatic Cancer-Induced Bone Pain: A Narrative Review.

Ann Colosia, Annete Njue, Zahid Bajwa, Erika Dragon, Rebecca L Robinson, Kristin M Sheffield, Sheena Thakkar, Steven H Richiemer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Methadone versus other opioids for refractory malignant bone pain: a pilot randomised controlled study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  3. Cancer pain.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ann ColosiaDepartment of Market Access and Outcomes Strategy, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Annete NjueDepartment of Market Access and Outcomes Strategy, RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK.
Zahid BajwaMedical Affairs, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Erika DragonMedical Affairs, Pfizer, Ltd, Budapest, Hungary.
Rebecca L RobinsonValue, Evidence, and Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1490-0491
Kristin M SheffieldValue, Evidence, and Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sheena ThakkarPatient Health & Impact, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7374-9130
Steven H RichiemerDivision of Pain Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone pain is one of the most common forms of pain reported by cancer patients with metastatic disease. We conducted a review of oncology literature to further understand the epidemiology of and treatment approaches for metastatic cancer-induced bone pain and the effect of treatment of painful bone metastases on the patient's quality of life. Two-thirds of patients with advanced, metastatic, or terminal cancer worldwide experience pain. Cancer pain due to bone metastases is the most common form of pain in patients with advanced disease and has been shown to significantly reduce patients' quality of life. Treatment options for cancer pain due to bone metastases include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, palliative radiation, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and opioids. Therapies including palliative radiation and opioids have strong evidence supporting their efficacy treating cancer pain due to bone metastases; other therapies, like bisphosphonates and denosumab, do not. There is sufficient evidence that patients who experience pain relief after radiation therapy have improved quality of life; however, a substantial proportion are nonresponders. For those still requiring pain management, even with available analgesics, many patients are undertreated for cancer pain due to bone metastases, indicating an unmet need. The studies in this review were not designed to determine why cancer pain due to bone metastases was undertreated. Studies specifically addressing cancer pain due to bone metastases, rather than general cancer pain, are limited. Additional research is needed to determine patient preferences and physician attitudes regarding choice of analgesic for moderate to severe cancer pain due to bone metastases.

Indexed as

bonecancercancer patientsmetastasispainquality of life

Identifiers

PMID36317162
PMCPMC9617513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.