Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36317145›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional medicine2022

Uterine artery embolization combined with ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: Efficacy and 5-8-year follow-up study.

Zhuxin Gu, Pengfei Jia, Ziyang Gao, Weiwei Gu, Hui Zhao, Suming Zhao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Subsequent Obstetric Outcomes: Focus on Postpartum Hemorrhage and Predictive Factors.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhuxin GuDepartment of Interventional Radiology,affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China.
Pengfei JiaDepartment of Interventional Radiology,affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China.
Ziyang GaoDepartment of Digital Subtraction Angiography,affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China.
Weiwei GuDepartment of Interventional Radiology,affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China.
Hui ZhaoDepartment of Interventional Radiology,affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China.
Suming ZhaoDepartment of Interventional Radiology,affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNNantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of uterine artery embolization (UAE) combined with dilation and curettage (D&C) using ultrasound as a treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and assess its effect on ovarian and reproductive function. Methods: A total of 54 patients with uterine CSP between January 2011 and December 2015 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were treated with UAE combined with D&C using ultrasound for the treatment of CSP and followed up for 5-8 years. Their medical records, medical histories, clinical manifestations, treatment courses, and treatment results were analyzed. Results: The 54 patients were initially treated without severe complications. β-Human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) normalization took 36.11 ​± ​10.73 days (range, 25-84 days), length of hospitalization was 6.6 ​± ​1.5 days (range, 4-10 days), and total blood loss was 18.48 ​± ​8.41 ​mL (range, 5-33 ​mL). All patients resumed normal menstruation after 33.48 ​± ​8.71 days (range, 26-70 days). At the 5-8-year follow-up after UAE combined with D&C by ultrasound for the treatment of uterine CSP, the menstrual volume in 32 (59.3%) patients decreased versus before the operation. Compared with pretreatment, the menstrual cycle was prolonged in two (3.7%) cases, shortened in 10 (18.5%) cases, irregular in one (1.9%) case, and unchanged in 39 (72.2%) cases. Three patients conceived naturally and successfully gave birth to healthy children. Seven (12.96%) patients with accidental natural pregnancies chose induced abortion with no significant change in their sex lives. Conclusion: UAE combined with D&C using ultrasound for the treatment of uterine CSP is safe and effective and may not affect the fertility of patients aged <40 years. However, menstrual volume may be reduced in some patients.

Indexed as

ComplicationsInfertilityOvarianScar pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36317145
PMCPMC9617151
OpenAlexW4225497312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.