ArticleArthritis research & therapy2022
Comment on "The effect of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on skeletal muscle mass in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis".
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We read with great interest the article by Hein et al., which described the meta-analysis study on the impact of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) therapy on skeletal muscle mass in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. While the data presented are impressive, we add some remarks about methodological issues that should be considered. First, this meta-analysis does not include several necessary studies that have provided data on the relationship between anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and body composition. To make the meta-analysis more comprehensive, it could be necessary to incorporate these studies into this analysis. Second, this study did not employ a representative measure of skeletal muscle mass that was adjusted for body size, such as skeletal muscle mass index (SMI). It is well recognized that skeletal muscle mass varies with body size, particularly height and body mass index. Given the heterogeneity background of body size in the studies included in this meta-analysis, it may be worthwhile to conduct an additional analysis regarding the associations between DMARDs and the adjusted measure of skeletal muscle mass such as SMI, which is recommended in several guidelines when determining and contrasting the quantity of skeletal muscle mass. Third, when determining body composition, several reports show variances between bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in RA as well as in general. In this regard, it may not be appropriate to simultaneously perform a meta-analysis of skeletal muscle mass determined by DEXA and BIA. With the issues described above, we conclude by recommending additional investigations to strengthen the arguments presented by this valuable meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.