Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316781›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2022

Comment on "The effect of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on skeletal muscle mass in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis".

Hiroto Minamino, Mie Torii, Masao Katsushima, Yoshihito Fujita, Motomu Hashimoto

Open access · goldAbstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroto MinaminoDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. h_minamino74@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Mie ToriiDepartment of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Masao KatsushimaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yoshihito FujitaDepartment of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Motomu HashimotoDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8586, Japan. motomu.hashimoto@omu.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JPOsaka Metropolitan University

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We read with great interest the article by Hein et al., which described the meta-analysis study on the impact of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) therapy on skeletal muscle mass in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. While the data presented are impressive, we add some remarks about methodological issues that should be considered. First, this meta-analysis does not include several necessary studies that have provided data on the relationship between anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and body composition. To make the meta-analysis more comprehensive, it could be necessary to incorporate these studies into this analysis. Second, this study did not employ a representative measure of skeletal muscle mass that was adjusted for body size, such as skeletal muscle mass index (SMI). It is well recognized that skeletal muscle mass varies with body size, particularly height and body mass index. Given the heterogeneity background of body size in the studies included in this meta-analysis, it may be worthwhile to conduct an additional analysis regarding the associations between DMARDs and the adjusted measure of skeletal muscle mass such as SMI, which is recommended in several guidelines when determining and contrasting the quantity of skeletal muscle mass. Third, when determining body composition, several reports show variances between bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in RA as well as in general. In this regard, it may not be appropriate to simultaneously perform a meta-analysis of skeletal muscle mass determined by DEXA and BIA. With the issues described above, we conclude by recommending additional investigations to strengthen the arguments presented by this valuable meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBody CompositionHumansMuscle, SkeletalTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic AgentsTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsDMARDMeta-analysisRheumatoid arthritisSarcopeniaSkeletal muscle mass

Identifiers

PMID36316781
PMCPMC9624041
OpenAlexW4307854771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.