Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316778›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2022

Establishing a framework for privacy-preserving record linkage among electronic health record and administrative claims databases within PCORnet

Daniel Kiernan, Thomas Carton, Sengwee Toh, Jasmin Phua, Maryan Zirkle, Darcy Louzao, Kevin Haynes, Mark Weiner, Francisco Angulo, Charles Bailey and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Privacy preserving record linkage for public health action: opportunities and challenges.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Daniel KiernanDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Thomas CartonLouisiana Public Health Institute, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Sengwee TohDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Jasmin PhuaDatavant, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
Maryan ZirkleCohen Veterans Bioscience, New York, NY, 10018, USA.
Darcy LouzaoDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Kevin HaynesScientific Affairs, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, 19801, USA.
Mark WeinerDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Francisco AnguloDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health and Hospital System, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Charles BaileyApplied Clinical Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jiang BianCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Daniel FortCenter for Outcomes and Health Services Research, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA.
Shaun GrannisRegenstrief Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Ashok Kumar KrishnamurthyUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Vinit Nair, Sharon, MA, 02067, USA.
Pedro RiveraOCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Jonathan SilversteinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206, USA.
Keith MarsoloDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. keith.marsolo@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4416-1549

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute CC2-Duke-2016-TO16Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute HP-1510-32545Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute HP-1511-32713Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-001Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-002Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-003Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-004Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-005Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-006Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-007Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-008Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute RI-CRN-2020-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether a secure, privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) methodology can be implemented in a scalable manner for use in a large national clinical research network.

resultsWe established the governance and technical capacity to support the use of PPRL across the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPrivacyDatabases, FactualHumansMedical Record LinkagePatient-Centered CareMedical record linkageMulticenter studiesPatient data privacy

Identifiers

PMID36316778
PMCPMC9620597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.