Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316772›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Interpretable machine learning predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy responses from personalized biochemical and biomechanical features.

Anamul Haque, Doug Stubbs, Nina C Hubig, Francis G Spinale, William J Richardson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anamul HaqueBiomedical Data Science & Informatics Program, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Doug StubbsBiomedical Data Science & Informatics Program, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Nina C HubigBiomedical Data Science & Informatics Program, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Francis G SpinaleSchool of Medicine, Columbia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
William J RichardsonBiomedical Data Science & Informatics Program, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. wricha4@clemson.edu.
Clemson University · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Tissue Structural and Neural Remodeling in Human Sacroiliac JointP20GM121342 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI Jeryl Jones · 2018 to 2026
$24.7M
Systems Mechanobiology Modeling for Patient-Specific Cardiac Fibrosis PredictionsR01HL144927 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI RICHARDSON, WILLIAM JAMES · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144927NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is a widely used, device-based therapy for patients with left ventricle (LV) failure. Unfortunately, many patients do not benefit from CRT, so there is potential value in identifying this group of non-responders before CRT implementation. Past studies suggest that predicting CRT response will require diverse variables, including demographic, biomarker, and LV function data. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to integrate diverse variable types into a machine learning algorithm for predicting individual patient responses to CRT.

methodsWe built an ensemble classification algorithm using previously acquired data from the SMART-AV CRT clinical trial (n = 794 patients). We used five-fold stratified cross-validation on 80% of the patients (n = 635) to train the model with variables collected at 0 months (before initiating CRT), and the remaining 20% of the patients (n = 159) were used as a hold-out test set for model validation. To improve model interpretability, we quantified feature importance values using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and used Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) to explain patient-specific predictions.

resultsOur classification algorithm incorporated 26 patient demographic and medical history variables, 12 biomarker variables, and 18 LV functional variables, which yielded correct prediction of CRT response in 71% of patients. Additional patient stratification to identify the subgroups with the highest or lowest likelihood of response showed 96% accuracy with 22 correct predictions out of 23 patients in the highest and lowest responder groups.

conclusionComputationally integrating general patient characteristics, comorbidities, therapy history, circulating biomarkers, and LV function data available before CRT intervention can improve the prediction of individual patient responses.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart FailureBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicHumansMachine LearningTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftBiomarkersBiomarkersCardiac resynchronization therapyHeart failureInterpretable machine learningPersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID36316772
PMCPMC9620606
OpenAlexW4307884247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.