Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316761›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Results from the AAPM Task Group 324 respiratory motion management in radiation oncology survey.

Helen J Ball, Lakshmi Santanam, Suresh Senan, James A Tanyi, Marcel van Herk, Paul J Keall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dosimetric impact of daily skin surface variations in kidney stereotactic ablative proton therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Heart substructure exposure during left breast cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric comparison between hybrid VMAT and 3DCRT in free breathing and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Helen J BallACRF Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lakshmi SantanamMedical Physics Department, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Suresh SenanAmsterdam University Medical Centers - VUmc Location, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
James A TanyiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Marcel van HerkDepartment of Radiotherapy Related Research, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Paul J KeallACRF Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGeisinger Neuroscience Institute · USManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe George Institute for Global Health · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify the clinical practice of respiratory motion management in radiation oncology.

methodsA respiratory motion management survey was designed and conducted based on clinician survey guidelines. The survey was administered to American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) members on 17 August 2020 and closed on 13 September 2020.

resultsA total of 527 respondents completed the entire survey and 651 respondents completed part of the survey, with the partially completed surveys included in the analysis. Overall, 84% of survey respondents used deep inspiration breath hold for left-sided breast cancer. Overall, 83% of respondents perceived respiratory motion management for thoracic and abdominal cancer radiotherapy patients to be either very important or required. Overall, 95% of respondents used respiratory motion management for thoracic and abdominal sites, with 36% of respondents using respiratory motion management for at least 90% of thoracic and abdominal patients. The majority (60%) of respondents used the internal target volume method to treat thoracic and abdominal cancer patients, with 25% using breath hold or abdominal compression and 13% using gating or tracking.

conclusionsA respiratory motion management survey has been completed by AAPM members. Respiratory motion management is generally considered very important or required and is widely used for breast, thoracic, and abdominal cancer treatments.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyBreath HoldingHumansMotionRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSurveys and QuestionnairesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited Statesclinical surveypatterns of practicerespiratory motion management

Identifiers

PMID36316761
PMCPMC9680579
OpenAlexW4307751919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.