Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316692›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2022

Proenkephalin A 119-159 predicts early and successful liberation from renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a post hoc analysis of the ELAIN trial.

Thilo von Groote, Felix Albert, Melanie Meersch, Raphael Koch, Christian Porschen, Oliver Hartmann, Deborah Bergmann, Peter Pickkers, Alexander Zarbock

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Implementation and One-Year Evaluation of Proenkephalin A in Critical Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thilo von Groote *Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Felix Albert *Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Melanie MeerschDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Raphael KochInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Christian PorschenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Oliver HartmannSphingoTec GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Deborah BergmannSphingoTec GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alexander ZarbockDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany. zarbock@uni-muenster.de.
University Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Münster · DERadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ZA428/18-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal replacement therapy (RRT) remains the key rescue therapy for critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI). However, there are currently no tools available to predict successful liberation from RRT. Biomarkers may allow for risk stratification and individualization of treatment strategies. Proenkephalin A 119-159 (penKid) has been suggested as a promising marker of kidney function in the context of AKI, but has not yet been evaluated for RRT liberation in critically ill patients with AKI.

methodsThis post hoc analysis included 210 patients from the randomized clinical ELAIN trial and penKid levels were measured in the blood of these patients. Competing risk time-to-event analyses were performed for pre-RRT penKid at initiation of RRT and in a landmark analysis at day 3 after initiation of RRT. Competing risk endpoints were successful liberation from RRT or death without prior liberation from RRT.

resultsLow pre-RRT penKid levels (penKid ≤ 89 pmol/l) at RRT initiation were associated with early and successful liberation from RRT compared to patients with high pre-RRT penKid levels (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.83, 95%CI 1.26-2.67, p = 0.002, estimated 28d-cumulative incidence function (28d-CIF) of successful liberation from RRT 61% vs. 45%, p = 0.022). This association persisted in the landmark analysis on day 3 of RRT (sHR 1.78, 95%CI 1.17-2.71, p = 0.007, 28d-CIF of successful liberation from RRT 67% vs. 47%, p = 0.018). For both time points, no difference in the competing event of death was detected.

conclusionsIn critically ill patients with RRT-dependent AKI, plasma penKid appears to be a useful biomarker for the prediction of shorter duration and successful liberation from RRT and may allow an individualized approach to guide strategies of RRT liberation in critically ill patients with RRT-dependent AKI.

trial registrationThe ELAIN trial was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: DRKS00004367) on 28th of May 2013.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCritical IllnessBiomarkersEnkephalinsHumansProtein PrecursorsRenal Replacement TherapyTime FactorsBiomarkersEnkephalinsproenkephalinProtein PrecursorsAcute kidney injuryAKIBiomarkerELAINpenKidProenkephalin ARenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID36316692
PMCPMC9624047
OpenAlexW4307887071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.