Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316652›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Joint reconstruction of neuron and ultrastructure via connectivity consensus in electron microscope volumes.

Bei Hong, Jing Liu, Hao Zhai, Jiazheng Liu, Lijun Shen, Xi Chen, Qiwei Xie, Hua Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bei HongSchool of Artificial Intelligence, School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jing LiuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hao ZhaiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiazheng LiuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lijun ShenNational Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. lijun.shen@ia.ac.cn.
Xi ChenNational Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qiwei XieResearch Base of Beijing Modern Manufacturing Development, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Hua HanSchool of Artificial Intelligence, School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. hua.han@ia.ac.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171461National Natural Science Foundation of China 61673381Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Science XDB32030200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNanoscale connectomics, which aims to map the fine connections between neurons with synaptic-level detail, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Currently, the automated reconstruction algorithms in electron microscope volumes are in great demand. Most existing reconstruction methodologies for cellular and subcellular structures are independent, and exploring the inter-relationships between structures will contribute to image analysis. The primary goal of this research is to construct a joint optimization framework to improve the accuracy and efficiency of neural structure reconstruction algorithms.

resultsIn this investigation, we introduce the concept of connectivity consensus between cellular and subcellular structures based on biological domain knowledge for neural structure agglomeration problems. We propose a joint graph partitioning model for solving ultrastructural and neuronal connections to overcome the limitations of connectivity cues at different levels. The advantage of the optimization model is the simultaneous reconstruction of multiple structures in one optimization step. The experimental results on several public datasets demonstrate that the joint optimization model outperforms existing hierarchical agglomeration algorithms.

conclusionsWe present a joint optimization model by connectivity consensus to solve the neural structure agglomeration problem and demonstrate its superiority to existing methods. The intention of introducing connectivity consensus between different structures is to build a suitable optimization model that makes the reconstruction goals more consistent with biological plausible and domain knowledge. This idea can inspire other researchers to optimize existing reconstruction algorithms and other areas of biological data analysis.

Indexed as

ElectronsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsConsensusNeuronsConnectivity conceptConnectomicsElectron microscope volumesJoint optimizationReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID36316652
PMCPMC9623997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.