Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316619›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Imaging Informatics Fellowship Curriculum: Building Consensus on the Most Critical Topics and the Future of the Informatics Fellowship.

Roger Gerard, Valeria Makeeva, Brianna Vey, Tessa S Cook, Paul Nagy, Ross W Filice, Kenneth C Wang, Patricia Balthazar, Peter Harri, Nabile M Safdar

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roger GerardDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, NE Suite D112, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. rgerard@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9198-3713
Valeria MakeevaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, NE Suite D112, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Brianna VeyDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, NE Suite D112, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Tessa S CookDepartment of Radiology, Ground Floor, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard Atrium, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Paul NagyDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St., Room 4223, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ross W FiliceDepartment of Radiology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Kenneth C WangDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, University of Maryland, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W. Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Patricia BalthazarDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, NE Suite D112, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Peter HarriDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, NE Suite D112, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Nabile M SafdarDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, NE Suite D112, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existing fellowship imaging informatics curriculum, established in 2004, has not undergone formal revision since its inception and inaccurately reflects present-day radiology infrastructure. It insufficiently equips trainees for today's informatics challenges as current practices require an understanding of advanced informatics processes and more complex system integration. We sought to address this issue by surveying imaging informatics fellowship program directors across the country to determine the components and cutline for essential topics in a standardized imaging informatics curriculum, the consensus on essential versus supplementary knowledge, and the factors individual programs may use to determine if a newly developed topic is an essential topic. We further identified typical program structural elements and sought fellowship director consensus on offering official graduate trainee certification to imaging informatics fellows. Here, we aim to provide an imaging informatics fellowship director consensus on topics considered essential while still providing a framework for informatics fellowship programs to customize their individual curricula.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateFellowships and ScholarshipsConsensusCurriculumDiagnostic ImagingHumansSurveys and Questionnaires“Core” curriculumInformatics educationInformatics topics

Identifiers

PMID36316619
PMCPMC9984571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.