Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316539›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Initial experience with a novel robotic surgical system in abdominal surgery.

Joseph El Dahdah, Mouhammad Halabi, Jado Kamal, Michael E Zenilman, Hatem Moussa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The death of laparoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph El DahdahSaint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mouhammad HalabiThe Department of Surgery, American Hospital Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Jado KamalThe Department of Surgery, American Hospital Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Michael E ZenilmanDepartment of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Hatem MoussaThe Department of Surgery, American Hospital Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. hmoussa@ahdubai.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of robotics in surgery has led to a recent boom in the acceptance of such technology. This technology has been rapidly adopted in various fields, with the most prominent being general surgery. The number of abdominal procedures being performed using robotics has increased to around 15.1% as potential advantages continue to be highlighted. We herein report the use of the Versius surgical robotic system for use in common abdominal procedures. Three experienced robotic surgeons first gained experience and became familiar with the robotic system through both online modules and cadaveric training sessions. The initial cases performed using the Versius robotic system at a single center were included in this study. Data reported included demographics as well as perioperative data. Fifty-five procedures were performed using the Versius robotic system. Procedures included various hernia repairs (n = 30), gallbladder surgery (n = 22), as well as appendix surgery (n = 3). Appendectomy had the fastest OR times at 35.81 ± 21.84, while the slowest OR times were seen in the BIH group with an average time of 95.2 ± 24. No complications or conversions were observed throughout this entire series. This is the first report to demonstrate the usage of the Versius robotic surgical system for use in abdominal surgery. Our initial data confirm that regardless of patient demographics, the system is safe to use in such procedures; however, further larger scale studies are required to assess its clinical utility.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsHerniorrhaphyHumansAbdominal surgeryAssessmentCMR versiusMinimally access surgery (MAS)Novel system implementationRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.