ArticleScientific reports2022
Quality and safety investigation of commonly used topical cosmetic preparations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heavy metal content of over-the-counter toothpastes-a systematic review ofFrontiers in dental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of toxic and essential metal content in selected children's, adult, and herbal toothpastes available in Türkiye: a cross-sectional analytical study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Study of contaminants in natural cosmetics.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2026Article
- Bacterial Contamination and Antimicrobial Resistance in Used Eye Cosmetic Products.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Interfacial and Bulk Properties of Volatile Amphiphiles and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Mixtures.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Skin Whitening Creams: Cosmetovigilance.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- Analysis of copper, zinc, arsenic, and lead content of over-the-counter toothpastes from india: an invitro study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancements of paper-based microfluidics and organ-on-a-chip models in cosmetics hazards.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Innovative Approaches to Enhancing Formulations and Skin Care Efficacy Through Mesoporous Silica Advancements.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- From Nature to Healing: Development and Evaluation of Topical Cream Loaded with Pine Tar for Cutaneous Wound Repair.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Contamination and Carcinogenic Risks of Lead in Lip Cosmetics in China.Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cosmetic and personal care products are considered an essential part of our daily care routine; hence, these products must be stable and safe for human use. This study aimed to assess the quality and safety of the most common cosmetic preparations. To select the products to be tested, a cross-sectional survey was distributed featuring the most used types and brands of products. Based on 447 responses from both males and females with different ages and education levels, 21 products from different brands were selected and tested in terms of microbial load, heavy metal content, and organoleptic properties. Microbial contamination was investigated using the aerobic plate count method. Lead (Pb), aluminum (Al), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), and arsenic (As) impurities were analyzed using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. The products included sunblock, lip balm, hand cream, hair cream, shampoo, cleanser, baby oil, baby powder, bar soap, hair dye, makeup, deodorant, hair serum, shaving gel, and toothpaste. Microbial contamination was found in 14 of the products, ranging between 1467.5 and 299.5 cfu/ml. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus species. Most of the tested products showed metal impurities, with toothpaste having the highest concentrations of Pb, Cr, As, Cu and Ni. The samples did not show lumps or discoloration, did not have characteristic odors, and had pH values ranging from 6.90 to 8.10. The continuous usage of such products could lead to serious negative consequences. As a result, ensuring the quality of cosmetic products is critical. Regulatory authorities are required to enforce strict legislation on cosmetic manufacturing to assess and ensure the quality and safety of the products before they reach consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.