ArticleScientific reports2022
Corneal Langerhans cells in children with celiac disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Celiac disease (CeD) is a common small bowel enteropathy characterized by an altered adaptive immune system and increased mucosal antigen presenting cells. This study aims to establish if quantification of corneal Langerhans cells (LCs) using corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) could act as a surrogate marker for antigen presenting cell status and hence disease activity in children with CeD. Twenty children with stable CeD and 20 age-matched controls underwent CCM and quantification of central corneal total, mature and immature LC density. There was no difference in age (11.78 ± 1.7 vs. 12.83 ± 1.91; P = 0.077) or height (1.38 ± 0.14 vs. 1.44 ± 0.13; P = 0.125). BMI (18.81 ± 3.90 vs. 22.26 ± 5.47; P = 0.031) and 25 OHD levels (43.50 ± 13.36 vs. 59.77 ± 22.45; P = 0.014) were significantly lower in children with CeD compared to controls. The total (33.33(16.67-59.37) vs. 51.56(30.21-85.42); P = 0.343), immature (33.33(16.67-52.08) vs. 44.79(29.17-82.29); P = 0.752) and mature (1.56(0-5) vs. 1.56(1.04-8.33); P = 0.752) LC density did not differ between the CeD and control groups. However, immature (r = 0.535, P = 0.015), mature (r = 0.464, P = 0.039), and total (r = 0.548, P = 0.012) LC density correlated with age. Immature (r = 0.602, P = 0.038) and total (r = 0.637, P = 0.026) LC density also correlated with tissue transglutaminase antibody (Anti-TtG) levels assessed in 12/20 subjects with CeD. There was no difference in corneal LC density between children with CeD and controls. However, the correlation between corneal LC density and anti-TtG levels suggests a relationship with disease activity in CeD and requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.