Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316412›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2022

Admixture has obscured signals of historical hard sweeps in humans.

Yassine Souilmi, Raymond Tobler, Angad Johar, Matthew Williams, Shane T Grey, Joshua Schmidt, João C Teixeira, Adam Rohrlach, Jonathan Tuke, Olivia Johnson and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Global patterns of natural selection inferred using ancient DNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Structural polymorphism and diversity of human segmental duplications.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. The contribution of gene flow, selection, and genetic drift to five thousand years of human allele frequency change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Yassine Souilmi *Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. yassine.souilmi@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7543-4864
Raymond Tobler *Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. raymond.tobler@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-1473
Angad Johar *Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. johar.angad@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9698-3352
Matthew WilliamsAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Shane T GreyTransplantation Immunology Group, Immunology Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Joshua SchmidtAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-7389
João C TeixeiraAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-4702
Adam RohrlachARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-5018
Jonathan TukeARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1688-8951
Olivia JohnsonAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Graham GowerAustralian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-3872
Chris TurneyChronos 14Carbon-Cycle Facility and Earth and Sustainability Science Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6733-0993
Murray CoxStatistics and Bioinformatics Group, School of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Alan Cooper *South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. alanjcooper42@gmail.com.
Christian D Huber *Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. cdh5313@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-2604
The University of Adelaide · AUARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers · AUAustralian National University · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUMassey University · NZMayo Clinic · USPennsylvania State University · USSouth Australian Museum · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of natural selection in shaping biological diversity is an area of intense interest in modern biology. To date, studies of positive selection have primarily relied on genomic datasets from contemporary populations, which are susceptible to confounding factors associated with complex and often unknown aspects of population history. In particular, admixture between diverged populations can distort or hide prior selection events in modern genomes, though this process is not explicitly accounted for in most selection studies despite its apparent ubiquity in humans and other species. Through analyses of ancient and modern human genomes, we show that previously reported Holocene-era admixture has masked more than 50 historic hard sweeps in modern European genomes. Our results imply that this canonical mode of selection has probably been underappreciated in the evolutionary history of humans and suggest that our current understanding of the tempo and mode of selection in natural populations may be inaccurate.

Indexed as

HominidaeSelection, GeneticAnimalsBiological EvolutionGenome, HumanGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36316412
PMCPMC9715430
OpenAlexW4307715669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.