ArticleScientific reports2022
Prediction of textile pilling resistance using optical coherence tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes a new method of textile pilling prediction, based on multivariate analysis of the spatial layer above the surface. The original idea of the method is the acquisition of 3D fabric image using optical coherence tomography (OCT) with infrared light, which allows for the fabric fuzz visualization with high sensitivity. The pilling layer, reconstructed with the resolution of [Formula: see text], includes reliable textural information related to the amount of loose fibers and bunches appearing as a result of abrasion. Pilling intensity was assigned by supervised classification of the textural features using both linear (PLS-DA - partial least squares discriminant analysis, LDA - linear discriminant analysis) and non-linear (SVM - support vector machine) classifiers. The results demonstrated that the method is more suitable for fabrics after short-term abrasion, when the fuzz prevails over tangled fibers in the pilling layer. In that case, pilling grades were predicted with [Formula: see text] accuracy, sensitivity and specificity (for SVM model). The validation accuracy of the tested models after machine abrasion achieves lower values (up to [Formula: see text] for LDA model). With our method, we clearly showed that OCT can be used to quantitatively trace appearance changes of fabric samples due to test abrasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.