Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316119›Full record

RevieweNeuro2023

A General Framework for Inferring Bayesian Ideal Observer Models from Psychophysical Data.

Tyler S Manning, Benjamin N Naecker, Iona R McLean, Bas Rokers, Jonathan W Pillow, Emily A Cooper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identifiability of Bayesian models of perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyler S ManningHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 tmanning@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8632-4249
Benjamin N NaeckerPsychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Iona R McLeanHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Bas RokersPsychology, New York University-Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-5332
Jonathan W PillowPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540.
Emily A CooperHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-7446

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN VISION SCIENCET32EY007043 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Suzanne MJ FLEISZIG · 1985 to 2026
$12.9M
Real-time statistical algorithms for controlling neural dynamics and behaviorR01EB026946 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI PARK, IL MEMMING, PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007043NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in neuroscience is how sensory inputs are transformed into percepts. At this point, it is clear that this process is strongly influenced by prior knowledge of the sensory environment. Bayesian ideal observer models provide a useful link between data and theory that can help researchers evaluate how prior knowledge is represented and integrated with incoming sensory information. However, the statistical prior employed by a Bayesian observer cannot be measured directly, and must instead be inferred from behavioral measurements. Here, we review the general problem of inferring priors from psychophysical data, and the simple solution that follows from assuming a prior that is a Gaussian probability distribution. As our understanding of sensory processing advances, however, there is an increasing need for methods to flexibly recover the shape of Bayesian priors that are not well approximated by elementary functions. To address this issue, we describe a novel approach that applies to arbitrary prior shapes, which we parameterize using mixtures of Gaussian distributions. After incorporating a simple approximation, this method produces an analytical solution for psychophysical quantities that can be numerically optimized to recover the shapes of Bayesian priors. This approach offers advantages in flexibility, while still providing an analytical framework for many scenarios. We provide a MATLAB toolbox implementing key computations described herein.

Indexed as

SensationBayes TheoremNormal DistributionProbabilityBayesian inferenceideal observer modelsperception

Identifiers

PMID36316119
PMCPMC9833051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.