Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316069›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Influence of social networks in healthcare on preparation for selection procedures of health professions education: a Dutch interview study.

Lianne Mulder, Anouk Wouters, Suzanne Fikrat-Wevers, Andries S Koster, Jan Hindrik Ravesloot, Gerda Croiset, Rashmi A Kusurkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lianne MulderAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands l.m.a.mulder@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7899-2762
Anouk WoutersAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6806-7573
Suzanne Fikrat-WeversInstitute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8022-3746
Andries S KosterDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7772-4654
Jan Hindrik RaveslootAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerda CroisetWenckebach Institute for Education and Training, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0242-9671
Rashmi A KusurkarAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9382-0379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHealth professions education (HPE) students are often not representative of the populations they will serve. The underrepresentation of non-traditional students is problematic because diversity is essential for promoting excellence in health education and care. This study aimed to understand the perceptions of traditional and non-traditional students regarding facilitators and barriers in preparing for HPE selection procedures, and to determine the role of social networks in their decision-making and preparations to apply.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted with 26 Dutch youth who were interested in university-level HPE programmes. Semistructured interviews and sociograms were analysed using thematic analysis, adopting a constructivist approach.

resultsTwenty-six high school students participated, with traditional and non-traditional backgrounds, with and without social networks in healthcare and higher education. Two themes were constructed. First, four high-impact facilitators helped to overcome barriers to apply and in preparation for selection: access to a social network connection working or studying in healthcare, to correct information, to healthcare experience and to a social network connection in higher education. Lack of information was the main barrier while access to social network connections in healthcare was the main facilitator to overcome this barrier. However, this access was unevenly distributed. Second, access alone is not enough: the need for agency to make use of available facilitators is also essential.

conclusionsThe themes are discussed using intersectionality. Traditional students with access to facilitators develop their self-efficacy and agency within social structures that privilege them, whereas non-traditional students must develop those skills without such structures. Our findings provide recommendations for the ways in which universities can remove barriers that cause unequal opportunities to prepare for the selection of HPE programmes. Along with equitable admissions, these recommendations can help to achieve a more representative student population and subsequently a better quality of health education and care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareStudents, Health OccupationsAdolescentHealth OccupationsHumansQualitative ResearchSocial Networkingeducation & training (see medical education & training)medical education & trainingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36316069
PMCPMC9628659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.