ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022
Measurement of Protein-Protein Interaction Dynamics Using Microfluidics and Particle Diffusometry.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the dynamic plant interactome: from in vitro assays to in vivo quantitative approaches.Plant methods · 2026Review
- Breaking the Low Concentration Barrier of Single-Molecule Fluorescence Quantification to the Sub-Picomolar Range.Small methods · 2026Article
- Biomolecular Interaction Analysis Quantification with a Low-Volume Microfluidic Chip and Particle Diffusometry.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Assessing Aptamer-Analyte Binding Kinetics by Microfluidic Fluorescence Microscopy.Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The measurement and optimization of protein-protein interactions are critical in the design of biotherapeutics, biomolecular sensing elements, and functional protein-based biomaterials among other biomolecular sciences and engineering. Current gold standard assays require specifically designed core facilities, equipment, and expertise to implement the measurement, making it inconvenient for most labs unless implemented routinely. We developed a new method aiming at measuring protein binding kinetics based on microfluidics and particle diffusometry (PD), which only needs very general lab equipment, including a fluorescence microscope, a syringe pump, and a simple microchannel fabricated on a glass slide. Protein binding pairs are immobilized on two kinds of nanoparticles with different diameters using widely available conjugation chemistries. The two diluted particle suspensions are injected using a syringe pump into a Y-junction microchannel, where they bind and form particle complexes with increasing size, thereby decreasing particles' Brownian motion amplitude and diffusivity, which can be detected by PD. By taking images at a series of specific points along the microchannel, the particle diffusivity is measured at different time points after the introduction of protein-protein binding. These data are then used to quantify the protein binding kinetic constant. This label-free particle-based method is simple to operate and as accurate as the current gold standard. We demonstrate the feasibility of this accessible method by quantifying the streptavidin-biotin association constant (1.74 ± 0.51 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.