Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36315591›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Assessing the efficacy of albendazole against hookworm in Vietnam using quantitative PCR and sodium nitrate flotation.

Clare E F Dyer, Naomi E Clarke, Dinh Ng Nguyen, H M P Dilrukshi Herath, Sze Fui Hii, Russell Pickford, Rebecca J Traub, Susana Vaz Nery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Clare E F DyerKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6950-4029
Naomi E ClarkeKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Dinh Ng NguyenFaculty of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Tay Nguyen University, Đắk Lắk, Vietnam.
H M P Dilrukshi HerathFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sze Fui HiiFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Russell PickfordBioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of New South Wales Analytical Centre, Sydney, Australia.
Rebecca J TraubFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Susana Vaz NeryKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThai Nguyen University · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preventive chemotherapy (PC), consisting of the regular distribution of anthelmintics to populations or groups of populations at risk, is the primary tool used to control soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections. This strategy, whilst cost-effective, raises the concern of potential emergence of drug resistance. The efficacy of anthelmintics against STH infections is measured using cure rate (CR) and egg reduction rate (ERR), using microscopy-based techniques such as the Kato-Katz thick smear. However, Kato-Katz has low sensitivity, especially for low-intensity infections, and requires fresh samples that need to be processed quickly. Realtime quantitative PCR (qPCR), which is more sensitive, is emerging as a "gold standard" for STH diagnostics given its higher sensitivity (important in low prevalence settings) and ability to differentiate hookworm species, while sodium nitrate flotation (SNF) may provide a low-cost more sensitive and practical alternative to Kato-Katz in the field. In this study, we examined the efficacy of a locally manufactured brand of albendazole 400 mg ("Alzental") against hookworm in Đắk Lắk province, Vietnam, using both qPCR and SNF. For qPCR, formulae to convert qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) values into eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) were utilised to determine efficacy calculations, and these values directly compared with efficacy values generated using SNF. Factors associated with CR and ERR were examined, and Alzental tablet quality was assessed by comparing with an Australian TGA-approved equivalent "Eskazole" tablet. We observed a CR and ERR of 64.9% and 87.5% respectively using qPCR, and 68.4% and 67.6% respectively using SNF. The tablet composition of Alzental was comparable to Eskazole in terms of active albendazole drug concentration with no evidence of impurities. This study demonstrates that the efficacy of Alzental against hookworm is within the range of previously reported studies for albendazole 400 mg. The study also demonstrates the value of qPCR and SNF as alternatives to standard Kato-Katz methodology for assessment of anthelmintic efficacy.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsHelminthiasisHookworm InfectionsAlbendazoleAncylostomatoideaAnimalsAustraliaFecesNitratesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSoilVietnamAlbendazoleAnthelminticsNitratessodium nitrateSoil

Identifiers

PMID36315591
PMCPMC9668116
OpenAlexW4307698929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.