Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36315563›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy after resuscitation from cardiac arrest in vasospastic angina: A retrospective study.

Kazuya Tateishi, Yusuke Kondo, Yuichi Saito, Hideki Kitahara, Kenichi Fukushima, Hidehisa Takahashi, Daichi Yamashita, Koichi Ohashi, Ko Suzuki, Osamu Hashimoto and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Coronary artery spasm in cardiac arrest survivors.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuya TateishiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7655-7628
Yusuke KondoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Yuichi SaitoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Hideki KitaharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Kenichi FukushimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Matsudo City General Hospital, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Hidehisa TakahashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Matsudo City General Hospital, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Daichi YamashitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Koichi OhashiDepartment of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ko SuzukiDepartment of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu HashimotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshiaki SakaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshio KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Chiba University · JPChiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPMatsudo City Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) who are resuscitated from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) are at a high risk of recurrent lethal arrhythmia and cardiovascular events. However, the benefit of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in this population has not been fully elucidated. The present study aimed to analyze the prognostic impact of ICD therapy on patients with VSA and SCA. A total of 280 patients who were resuscitated from SCA and received an ICD for secondary prophylaxis were included in the present multicenter registry. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the presence of VSA. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and appropriate ICD therapy (appropriate anti-tachycardia pacing and shock) for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. Of 280 patients, 51 (18%) had VSA. Among those without VSA, ischemic cardiomyopathy was the main cause of SCA (38%), followed by non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (18%) and Brugada syndrome (7%). Twenty-three (8%) patients were dead and 72 (26%) received appropriate ICD therapy during a median follow-up period of 3.8 years. There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint between patients with and without VSA (24% vs. 33%, p = 0.19). In a cohort of patients who received an ICD for secondary prophylaxis, long-term clinical outcomes were not different between those with VSA and those with other cardiac diseases after SCA, suggesting ICD therapy may be considered in patients with VSA and those with other etiologies who were resuscitated from SCA.

Indexed as

Coronary VasospasmDefibrillators, ImplantableHeart ArrestDeath, Sudden, CardiacFollow-Up StudiesHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36315563
PMCPMC9621437
OpenAlexW4307699382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.