Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36315343›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2022

Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) mainstream or unconventional option? Study exploring the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric dentists' views and practices of MID for managing carious primary teeth in children across the United Kingdom and European Union.

A BaniHani, A Hamid, J Van Eeckhoven, S Gizani, S Albadri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hypomineralised second primary molars: the Würzburg concept.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A BaniHaniDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, The Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK. banihanialaa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7733-272X
A HamidBristol Dental Hospital, Bristol, UK.
J Van EeckhovenSchool of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
S GizaniDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
S AlbadriSchool of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Leeds · GBNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity Of Bristol Dental Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the techniques used to manage carious primary teeth during the COVID-19 pandemic by paediatric dentists and dentists with a special interest in paediatric dentistry (DwSI) who are members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry (BSPD) and the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD), and their views on the use of minimal intervention dentistry (MID) in children prior to, during and post the COVID era.

methodsA total of 212 paediatric dentists and DwSI completed an online questionnaire. Six MID techniques were explored: fissure sealants, resin infiltration, Hall Technique (HT), 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF), atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), stepwise removal and selective caries removal.

resultsThe majority were specialists (26%) followed by clinical academics (23.1%) working mainly in university teaching hospitals (46.2%). Routine dental treatment for children with carious primary teeth was provided by the majority (92.5%) during the pandemic. HT (96%) and 38% SDF (65.7%) were the most commonly used techniques among the BSPD members whereas conventional restoration of non-selective caries removal and pulp therapy remained the most widely used technique among the EAPD members (66.2%). Most of the MID techniques were used as a treatment option (48.1%) rather than a choice (43.4%), with most of these choices having been affected by the patient's behaviour (82.5%). More than one thirds (39.2%) of the participants were reluctant to adopt MID after the pandemic. Several barriers such as lack of teaching and confidence as well as perceived lack of evidence were identified.

conclusionA range of MID techniques is practiced broadly by a sample of paediatric dentists and DwSI across the United Kingdom (U.K) and European Union (E.U). The majority of clinicians are willing to continue using these techniques going forward after COVID restrictions are lifted. The pandemic served as an opportunity for many dentists to become familiar with various MID practices, such as SDF, which has been already established some time ago.

Indexed as

COVID-19Dental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentDental CariesChildDentistsEuropean UnionFluorides, TopicalHumansPandemicsPractice Patterns, Dentists'Quaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver CompoundsTooth, DeciduousUnited KingdomFluorides, TopicalQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSilver Compoundssilver diamine fluorideCOVID-19Dental cariesHall techniqueMinimal intervention dentistryOral healthcare for childrenPaediatric dentistsPrimary teethSilver diamine fluoride

Identifiers

PMID36315343
PMCPMC9619005
OpenAlexW4307909373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.