Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36315225›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Informing mHealth and Web-Based Eating Disorder Interventions: Combining Lived Experience Perspectives With Design Thinking Approaches.

Hannah K Jarman, Siân A McLean, Rachel Rodgers, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Susan Paxton, Beth O'Gorman, Emily Harris, Adrian Shatte, Katie Bishop, Tahlia Baumann and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Design, Implement, Sustain: Advancing Program-Led Interventions for Binge Eating, a Narrative Review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Hannah K JarmanSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8225-4511
Siân A McLeanSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-2037
Rachel RodgersApplied Psychology Program for Eating and Appearance Research, Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2582-4220
Matthew Fuller-TyszkiewiczSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1145-6057
Susan PaxtonSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8486-1996
Beth O'GormanMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3783-715X
Emily HarrisMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1777-083X
Adrian ShatteDepartment of Planning, Performance & Analytics, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6225-9697
Katie BishopSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9252-5653
Tahlia BaumannSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7774-3019
Danielle MahoneySchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-6827
Melissa-Claire DaugelatDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-4478
Zali YagerInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-7374
Deakin University · AULa Trobe University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Queensland · AUJames Cook University · AUNortheastern University · USUniversity of Tübingen · DEVictoria University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApp-based interventions designed to prevent and treat eating disorders have considerable potential to overcome known barriers to treatment seeking. Existing apps have shown efficacy in terms of symptom reduction; however, uptake and retention issues are common. To ensure that apps meet the needs and preferences of those for whom they were designed, it is critical to understand the lived experience of potential users and involve them in the process of design, development, and delivery. However, few app-based interventions are pretested on and co-designed with end users before randomized controlled trials.

objectiveTo address the issue, this study used a highly novel design thinking approach to provide the context and a lived experience perspective of the end user, thus allowing for a deeper level of understanding.

methodsIn total, 7 young women (mean age 25.83, SD 5.34, range 21-33 years) who self-identified as having a history of body image issues or eating disorders were recruited. Participants were interviewed about their lived experience of body image and eating disorders and reported their needs and preferences for app-based eating disorder interventions. Traditional (thematic analysis) and novel (empathy mapping; visually depicting and empathizing with the user's personal experience) analyses were performed, providing a lived experience perspective of eating disorders and identifying the needs and preferences of this population in relation to app-based interventions for eating disorders. Key challenges and opportunities for app-based eating disorder interventions were also identified.

resultsFindings highlighted the importance of understanding and identifying problematic eating disorder symptoms for the user, helpful practices for recovery that identify personal values and goals, the role of social support in facilitating hope, and aspects of usability to promote continued engagement and recovery.

conclusionsPractical guidance and recommendations are described for those developing app-based eating disorder interventions. These findings have the potential to inform practices to enhance participant uptake and retention in the context of app-based interventions for this population.

Indexed as

app-based interventionco-designdesign thinkingeating disordersinterviewslived experiencemHealthmobile healthyoung women

Identifiers

PMID36315225
PMCPMC9664336
OpenAlexW4307842778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.